User talk:Matthewross
Welcome
[edit]Hi Matthew, welcome to Wikipedia (actually you've been here a while, and it's disappointing no-one thought fit to say hi before now).
Although you seem fairly settled in already, you might find these links helpful in editing pages or creating new ones: How to edit a page, Tutorial, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should probably read our policies at some point too.
But don't feel you have to read every policy document before you do anything. Dive in, be bold in editing, and if you do anything wrong, someone will be quick to correct it and let you know (hopefully, politely!)
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
You may have already noticed that you can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too, as I've done below. This is mostly useful, and is considered good wikiquette, on talk pages. But be aware that the actual wikipedia articles should never be signed - they belong to the community, rather than the individual who created them.
You'll notice I added a photo to Wellington Church - if you find a Glasgow (or central belt) article that you think needs a photo, do drop me a note on my talk page (although the photo season is largely gone, so it might linger on my to-do list until Spring). For other places Wikipedia:Requested pictures is a good place to leave a request.
Again, welcome! -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 19:04, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Wellington nominated
[edit]Thanks for making the (fascinating) anti-burgher article (question: should it be capitalised that way?). Armed with it, I've nominated Wellington Church on Template_talk:Did_you_know#October_4 as promised. Unless there are objections, I imagine it'll be on the main page (meaning it'll get in the vicinity of a million pageviews) on Friday or Monday (they don't run DYK on weekends). At that point expect a flurry of edits to it - some helpful, some nitpicky (I've learned to mostly bite my tongue), and the odd childish (and quickly reverted) vandalism. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 00:36, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]
|
Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Wellington Church, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
parishes, presbyteries and synods
[edit]There's a discssion going on over at Talk:List of Church of Scotland presbyteries and parishes which may interest you. --Doc ask? 23:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Donald Caskie
[edit]Just wanted to say thanks for the article about Donald Caskie which I've just read with interest. Euchiasmus 22:46, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion
[edit]Hello! I noticed that you have been a contributor to articles on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. You may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand Anglican-related articles! Cheers! Fishhead64 22:54, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Belgium
[edit]Hello,
I would like to inform you that WikiProject Belgium has been created. The goal is to provide a forum for people living in Belgium/connected to Belgium (:)) who would like to contribute to articles that are related to this country. It's completely up to you, but you are welcome to join us (you can add your name on the list of participants in that case). The working language will be English. Greetings, Evilbu 17:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Finlay Macdonald (Moderator)
[edit]I added some changes to your page Finlay Macdonald (Moderator) and placed some requests on Macdonald's talk page. I also submitted a Did You Know request for the page.-- Jreferee 05:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]|
|
On 8 November, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Finlay Macdonald (Moderator), which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--Allen3 talk 12:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Lord High Commissioner to the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland
[edit]Hello. I was looking over the list of past high commissioners and one entry struck me as odd: Ralph Kerr, later Earl of Dalkeith. The earldom wasn't created until the 17th century, and then it was associated with the Scotts, not the Kerrs. This has led me to wonder about the veracity of the list. What was your source? Best, Mackensen (talk) 13:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- The source was the official Church of Scotland Yearbook for 1908, which includes a full list of Moderators and Lords High Commissioner. The list was compiled by the Rev Robert W. Weir. The entry for the Assembly of April 1582 states that the Commissioner was "Mr Ralph Kerr, afterwards Earl of Lothian".--Matthewross 20:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
University of Dundee - Chapel entry
[edit]Hi. I'd just like to address your recent edit on the University of Dundee page. I rather feel it is considerably too long within the article considering the rather specialised relevance - not to mention that there is something of a problem in allowing any great recognition to recognised bodies which cater to students (as there are countless). It certainly does not warrant its own Level 1 heading - which, you may care to note, is a privilege not even given to the Students' Association, IMO.
If you'd care to do a bit of editing to it, it would be helpful. I'd do it myself, but you'd probably be a better judge of what is significant and notable. --Breadandcheese 21:45, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Rail transport in Gibraltar
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, Rail transport in Gibraltar, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rail transport in Gibraltar. Thank you. (PS. The nominator forgot to leave this courtesy, so I have instead.) -- Chris B • talk • contribs 19:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
List of Moderators of the Church of Scotland
[edit]According to a (very old) Who's Who I picked up a few years ago, both Archibald Hamilton Charteris AND William Garden Blaikie were elected 1892 Moderator of the General Assembly. As far as I know (which possibly I don't) there's only one moderator at a time, and neither of these guys died in 1892 (which might have given rise to an unplanned vacancy). I guess there might have been some kind of a schism. Anyway, you look as though you just might have the educational background to know the answer to this seeming riddle without needing to dig. Thank you, in any case, for having thought about it. Regards Charles01 (talk) 15:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
The article Stobswell Church, Dundee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Appears to be a run-of-the-mill church that fails WP:N. Searches turn up no relevant secondary sources other than passing mentions and directory listings.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Deor (talk) 15:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Matthewross! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 51 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Eric Milligan (politician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- John B. Cairns - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Gaelic-speaking congregations in the Church of Scotland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 03:23, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)