User talk:Matthewmorrison34

June 2020

Hello, I'm DIYeditor. Your recent edit(s) to the page Brussels appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —DIYeditor (talk) 12:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Climate

Hi, in regards to your question I reverted the edits because you did not cite any source bellow the Weather box, if you want to change something it has to be agreedable and VERIFIABLE and has to have a SOURCE cited below, you explained the source was from NOAA but you did not cite any source, the link you wrote is a google search not even a website. By the way, the temperatures and the sun records you wrote are absurd and don't make any sense. Please leave a real source, not a google search Average Portuguese Joe (talk) 15:46, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Average Portuguese Joe the google search directly brings to NOAA's data. It is the first thing that shows up.

Your recent edits

Your recent editing history at Alicante shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --TechnicianGB (talk) 23:53, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Investigation at the Administrators noticeboard.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --TechnicianGB (talk) 23:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]