User talk:MattatFrontlineChurch

Welcome!

Hello, MattatFrontlineChurch, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:MattatFrontlineChurch, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MattatFrontlineChurch

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:MattatFrontlineChurch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Explain please... MattatFrontlineChurch (talk) 20:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you to dictate to me about your own soapboxness in the above slander that you messaged me with? MattatFrontlineChurch (talk) 20:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not dictate that others can't have beliefs. How dare you disrespect Jesus by your arrogance. I posted an introduction about a church. It says what the church is and when it was formed. No advertising at all. You will get your comeuppance at the judgement seat. MattatFrontlineChurch (talk) 20:23, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Drm310 and on this page. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Meters (talk) 20:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're the ones attacking me just for putting history of a particular church online. Please stop attacking other editors yourself. Many thanks. MattatFrontlineChurch (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not attacking you and I didn't touch the article in question. I simply warned you for making persona attacks. Your post on User talk:Drm310 was a blatant person attack and I have removed it. Your posts above are personal attacks and verge on a legal threat. Please read WP:NLT. Meters (talk) 20:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And you have just blatantly attacked me. Like I say I made a biography about a church. Churches are part of history of the world. End of. Please stop attacking me. I will have to email the owner of Wikipedia if you continue to bully me. Thank you. Respect others. MattatFrontlineChurch (talk) 20:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Frontline Church. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Meters (talk) 20:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're the ones attacking me. Attacking my faith. Attacking Jesus.

You're the ones that make things up about others. I put factual information in a page about a church. I have every right under the equality of faith act. Please leave me alone. MattatFrontlineChurch (talk) 20:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, MattatFrontlineChurch. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Frontline Church, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Since you claim to work for the church [1], you have a conflict of interest. Meters (talk) 20:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely false explaination above. There are plenty of pages which display history of particular churches. Please take a moment before you send yet another rude message. Thanks. MattatFrontlineChurch (talk) 20:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page is VERY out of date. Who are you to tell me that I can't edit a page about the history of a church when it's years out of date??? MattatFrontlineChurch (talk) 20:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have a clear conflict of interest. Please follow the COI rules and propose your changes on the article's talk page. And don't add insourced promotional trivia. Wikipedia is not the place to say such things as "including Volunteer Receptionist of the Year 2019 award winner Matt Crew" [[2]] `Meters (talk) 20:50, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a place where editors are expected to engage civilly with others. Your unprovoked attacks on others who are simply advising you of our policies and guidelines is not acceptable. If it continues, you will be blocked from editing here.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:56, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MattatFrontlineChurch, please read the paid-contributions disclosure and the conflict of interest guideline referenced above. The proper way to handle this is to put a new section on the article's talk page with your requested change. Use Template:Requested edit, it will "flag" the request for attention so it gets noticed. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So as a community, you have a right to say whatever lies you want about my church? A page that you as editors have created, and yet when I put correct information you delete it? Please read the freedom of right to edit wrongful representation act. Thanks in advance. MattatFrontlineChurch (talk) 21:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to request changes using the talk page as has been explained to you. Repeatedly. There is no such thing as "the freedom of right to edit wrongful representation act", and if you're somehow trying to make this a free speech issue, you can review WP:FREE.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:09, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And the only information that has been deleted from Frontline Church so far is the bit about the volunteer receptionist, Matt Crew, and one external link that had no apparent connection to the church. Meters (talk) 21:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Frontline Church while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Your COI notice applies to you regardless of whether you are using your named account or an IP, as does the warning for personal attacks. Meters (talk) 03:56, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]