User talk:MattSebastian88

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Wikiproject Medicine!

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia from Wikiproject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of content about health here on Wikipedia, pursuing the mission of Wikipedia to provide the public with articles that present accepted knowledge, created and maintained by a community of editors.

One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board!

First, some basics about editing Wikipedia, which is a strange place behind the scenes; you may find some of the ways we operate to be surprising. Please take your time and understand how this place works. Here are some useful links, which have information to help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Everything starts with the mission - the mission of Wikipedia is to provide the public with articles that summarize accepted knowledge, working in a community of editors. (see WP:NOT)
• We find "accepted knowledge" for biomedical information in sources defined by WP:MEDRS -- we generally use literature reviews published in good journals or statements by major medical or scientific bodies and we generally avoid using research papers, editorials, and popular media as sources for such content. We read MEDRS sources and summarize them, giving the most space and emphasis (what we call WP:WEIGHT) to the most prevalent views found in MEDRS sources.
• Please see WPMED's "how to" guide for editing content about health
• More generally please see The five pillars of Wikipedia and please be aware of the "policies and guidelines" that govern what we do here; these have been generated by the community itself over the last fifteen years, and you will need to learn them (which is not too hard, it just takes some time). Documents about Wikipedia - the "back office" - reside in "Wikipedia space" where document titles are preceded by "Wikipedia:" (often abbreviated "WP:"). WP space is separate from "article space" (also called "mainspace") - the document at WP:CONSENSUS is different from, and serves as a different purpose than, the document at Consensus.

Every article and page in Wikipedia has an associated talk page, and these pages are essential because we editors use them to collaborate and work out disagreements. (This is your Talk page, associated with your user page.) When you use a Talk page, you should sign your name by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comment; the Wikipedia software will automatically convert that into links to your Userpage and this page and will add a datestamp. This is how we know who said what. We also "thread" comments in a way that you will learn with time. Please see the Talk Page Guidelines to learn how to use talk pages.

• Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. You can also just add our talk page to your watchlist and join in discussions that interest you. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, edit, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss it on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note below if you have any questions or problems. I wish you all the best here in Wikipedia! --Jytdog (talk) 06:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Could you please help me out in choosing the best references??

Hello Jytdog,

Thank you so much for being kind enough to let me know, how things work here. Could you help me with some easy steps on finding the finest references?

MattSebastian88 (talk) 06:41, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply! I do hope you take time to work through the stuff in the links above, but we usually find reviews on pubmed. There is a list of places to find refs at WP:WikiProject Medicine/Resources; that is linked from WP:MEDHOW which is linked above. Most medical articles also have a header on their talk pages, with preformatted links to pubmed and other good places.... Jytdog (talk) 06:58, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Want to Work on articles that read like an advertisement

Hello Jytdog,

Thanks for your reply. I did go through those links once. I will go through them again for 2-3 times. Firstly, I want to learn more about neutrality. So, I want to work on articles that read like advertisements(any niche), until I get a better control over my tone.

It would be great, if you could help me find a way to find the articles that have these issues?

MattSebastian88 (talk) 09:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

See Category:Articles_with_a_promotional_tone.

Everything -- and I mean everything -- in Wikipedia begins with sources. If you use press releases (or churnalism, like pretty much anything at phys.org) as a source, like you did here, the editing is hopeless. If you start with high quality independent sources (think New York Times or Wall Street Journal) you stand a much better chance of generating neutral content. A high quality source will generally not just be transmitting a marketing message.

You need to be very careful with trade rags like you used here. Sometimes those are great for providing context but sometimes they are just churnalism or rah rah promotion. Jytdog (talk) 09:39, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Deeper dive

If you want an all-in-one place rundown of how Wikipedia works, you can see User:Jytdog/How where i tried to make a coherent and brief-as-possible explanation of this crazy place. Jytdog (talk) 09:43, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

I will work on Cytosorbent and Stryker Corporation pages

Hello again Jytdog,

Thanks for pointing out my mistakes, I will work on them again, and look for some notable sources to support my statments. I will be visiting here User:Jytdog/How very soon.

Any doubts, I will get back to you.

Thanks, MattSebastian88 (talk) 09:51, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

You are being super responsive. Thanks for that! Jytdog (talk) 09:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Was on a really long holiday... I want to fix those two articles in which used irrelevant references -

Could you please let me know if this reference is okay for my edit on Cytosorbents - http://markets.on.nytimes.com/research/stocks/news/press_release.asp?docTag=201708140715PR_NEWS_USPRX____NY64258&feedID=600&press_symbol=1764928&mcubz=0 MattSebastian88 (talk) 07:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Nope. Please avoid press releases (as well as churnalism sources that are lightly edited press releases) like the plague. Please avoid self-generated sources as much as possible, and use independent, high quality sources. Thx Jytdog (talk) 07:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Understood. Thanks Jytdog. MattSebastian88 (talk) 07:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

MattSebastian88, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MattSebastian88! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Spam in Gait belt

Hello, I'm Quisqualis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Is "Matt Sebastian" a paid spammer from India?

You seem to have gone "a bridge too far" with your addition of a Craigslist ad to Gait belt. In looking at your contributions, you seem to be adding material to WP with promotional intent only. I am reporting you to the vandalism page.--Quisqualis (talk) 19:56, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Craiglist link was a Mistake Quisqualis, I'll make sure it won't repeat again. More details on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#Editor_specializing_in_.22spam_lite.22

Courtesy notice

Your editing is being discussed at: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#Editor_specializing_in_.22spam_lite.22. Please consider joining the discussion. --Ronz (talk) 01:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)