User talk:Matias2027

Welcome!

Hello, Matias2027, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Comatmebro (talk) 06:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars (1977)

Hello, Matias2027. You have new messages at DonQuixote's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Co-Cousin-In Law

Please respond on the talk page on why you added Co-cousin-in-law to the cousin article. I cant find any references to support it and don't want to remove it without your input.198.151.8.4 (talk) 14:57, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because that's how i think we call the spouse of the cousin of a spouse or the cousin of the spouse of a cousin. I deduced it because of the definition of a co-sibling-in-law Matias2027 (talk) 14:59, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please correspond on the talk page of the cousin page, there is lots of other comments by me there. I can not find any references to co-sibling-in-law either. In Wikipedia what you did is called Wikipedia:Synthesis. It is a bit of a no-no. Take a read if you please, and if you can, please clean up what you did on other pages. I understand that it can be frustrating when you start out editing, especially since lots of editors selectively apply the rules to you (much like what happened to you in your star wars edit. I mean by god, the whole plot section is unreferenced, and he picks on you for clarifying a single point without a reference) and that rudeness he used "go edit fan pages" as if what he does is somehow better. As an FYI also, you can add a ":" before your reply on a talk page (like I did for you) to indicate what you are replying too.198.151.8.4 (talk) 16:08, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Nazism—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 14:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry the thing is i hate nazis Matias2027 (talk) 14:17, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an excuse for vandalism. Doug Weller talk 14:21, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Club Nacional de Football. Doug Weller talk 14:21, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think everybody hates nazis as much as do i Matias2027 (talk) 14:35, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to read Wikipedia:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you. - Samf4u (talk) 15:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Club Nacional de Football—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry. The thing is I'm uruguayan and i don't like that team Matias2027 (talk) 16:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to War—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 21:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm RacoonyRE. I noticed that in this edit to Club Nacional de Football, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RacoonyRE ^{Message me}_{Contributions} 17:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Matías2028 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Matías2028. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cabayi (talk) 08:12, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matias2027 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know what I did wrong

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.