User talk:Mathsgeek
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Mathsgeek, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!
- Editing tutorial, learn to have fun with Wikipedia.
- Picture tutorial, instructions on uploading images.
- How to write a great article, to make it an featured article status.
- Manual of Style, how articles should be written.
Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :
Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)
- --Adam 
(talk) 17:53, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Deleted text
[edit](Regarding Homer Simpson): Thanks, man. I have no idea what happened there. Must have been some sort of browser upload problem. -- Steven Fisher 19:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
That's fine, thanks for the feedback. --Mathsgeek 20:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
MobyGames links
[edit]Hey, I noticed you've been removing links to MobyGames pages from articles recently; is there a discussion you can point me to which states that MobyGames links aren't permitted on Wikipedia? I'm asking because, though I haven't added any such links myself, I consider MobyGames to be a relatively useful database with some content one couldn't find anywhere else; therefore, I think the references to the site should be retained or restored in their respective articles. Thanks, Cromag 21:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, I shall stop the editing and continue the discussion, though please bear in mind that the majority of the links that I have removed have very little to add to the articles. And I tried to ignore deleting moby links with alot of content. The discussion was here.--Mathsgeek 21:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for providing a link to the ongoing discussion; it seems the issue is more complicated than I had considered it to be. My take on the matter is this - if a link to MobyGames is included:
- without the editor having given it much thought,
- in a case where the game or version in question is so obscure as to have almost no information listed,
- for every single version that was ever available on the market (this applies when there were numerous versions, of course),
- it should be removed. However, I also consider cover/screenshot galleries and trivia pages to be both useful and informative, especially when the article in question is a stub several sentences long. Also, I think we should take into account the fact that MobyGames is frequently used as a reference; therefore, should the content of the article be similar to that of the MobyGames page, it's fathomable that such a link could be included. That said, it is definitely not right to randomly insert MG links into every game article in existence. Some of the games – primarily adventure games – whose articles are on my watchlist have, if I'm not mistaken, quite helpful MobyGames pages, which is why I reacted in the first place. Finally, in a day or two, I'll check the MG entries for the games on my watchlist to see and decide whether they have a sufficient amount of information for inclusion in the article. Thanks, Cromag 21:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with you on that there are cases where the mobygames links are a good addtion to an article, like you mentioned with good triva and information about the game. I apologise if i have removed a content rich mobygames link, please don't hesitate to put back links that you feel that I have wrongly removed. Thankyou for your time in looking at this matter. --Mathsgeek 22:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for providing a link to the ongoing discussion; it seems the issue is more complicated than I had considered it to be. My take on the matter is this - if a link to MobyGames is included:
Why do you remove the MobyGames links without replying to me on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#MobyGames_policy? Picking three examples from your latest contributions Inca (video game), Wayne's World (game) and Ugh! reveals that those MobyGames pages contains indeed more information than the article itself. The NeveR SLeePiNG 14:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- First of all I apologise for not replying to you before doing the edits, I did not realise that you were strongly against the edits. Maybe some of the links I edited out do contain more information than the article, such as the one you've pointed out, however a majority of them don't. I have only edited out the links that you have put in, and you must concede that alot of the links you've added you've just added without checking on the content of the link. As I've said above I shall stop editing out mobygames links and wait and see how the discussion progresses.--Mathsgeek 21:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#MobyGames.2F_Flipkin for interest--BozMo talk 11:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)