User talk:MathsandStuff

This is MathsandStuff's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ralph Gordon Stanton (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Topcipher was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article seems to be heavily paraphrased from the following link -
http://passages.winnipegfreepress.com/passage-details/id-163971/STANTON_RALPH
Also, specifically for this article, please refer WP:HEADER and kindly divide it in sections for better reference. Thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ralph Gordon Stanton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TopCipher (talk) 17:53, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! MathsandStuff, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TopCipher (talk) 17:53, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ralph Gordon Stanton has been accepted

Ralph Gordon Stanton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 18:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ralph Gordon Stanton

An almost universal mistake in creation of biographical articles is this: The reasons why the person is so notable that there should be a Wikipedia article about the person should appear at the outset, almost always in the first paragraph and not unusually in the first one or two sentences. One shouldn't just list events of the person's life chronologically so that the person reading the whole article will ultimately find out how the person is notable. Could you edit this article accordingly? Michael Hardy (talk) 22:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, not that so far, only one other page links to this article. If you know of, or can identify, other pages that should link to it, could you add the links? Michael Hardy (talk) 22:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]