User talk:Matgam1

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from PlayStation Portable homebrew. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GSK (talk ● evidence) 21:39, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Crossmr (talk) 01:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Matgam1 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Crossmr (talk) 02:42, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Matgam1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was warned once 2 days before and then, after doing nothing, I was completely blocked. Just because there was an edit by someone a few minutes later doesn't mean it's the same person. Track our IP adresses if you want.

Decline reason:

I was about to decline for using an all-too-common sockpuppet argument, but then I saw Luna's comment below. You realize most people who ask for this sort of thing usually don't get that lucky. Not that it worked, anyway. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

From a checkuser perspective, it looks to me more like the two accounts are operated by people who know each other or otherwise share a common interest -- WP:MEAT might be good reading. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:21, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]