User talk:Materialistically
Welcome!
[edit]
|
March 2021
[edit]
Hello, I'm FDW777. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bodhi Elfman, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 14:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bodhi Elfman, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 13:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Leland Orser, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
[edit]
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! TAXIDICAE💰 18:40, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
[edit] Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Furt plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 1963. Elizium23 (talk) 12:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please explain and discuss your suggested changes to dates in the infobox on the article's talk page. Your changes do not appear to be supported by the narrative in the article. Schazjmd (talk) 23:42, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Years active
[edit]Hello, please refrain from changing this field, especially without providing an edit summary that explains your rationale. I've reverted your three edits from tonight because they are contradicted by the article narratives. Feel free to suggest changes on the talk page if you feel something is wrong. If you continue as you have been, it is likely to be taken for disruptive editing or even vandalism and you're likely to be blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Cast bloat
[edit]First please follow the WP:SIMPLE rules and try to explain your changes with a meaningful edit summary.
Secondly stop bloating Infoboxes and lead sections with minor cast[1] Template:Infobox film says to add cast based on those who appear on the poster, and the lead section also warns to emphasize only the key points of the article.
Adding more cast is not constructive, it is better for readers for the lead section to highlight the main cast. Longer cast lists are better left to the cast section.
Please familiarize yourself with guidelines at WP:MOSFILM and please look to {{Featured article}}s as an example of what the best articles should be doing. -- 109.79.168.147 (talk) 14:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)