User talk:Matecumbe
Welcome
[edit]
|
Thanks for explaining your edit! Edit summaries are one of the best features of Wikipedia—they save time and prevent uncertainty. Rivertorch (talk) 17:24, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! Drop by the Teahouse anytime for a cup of tea, or some help with editing!
[edit]
|
Hello! Matecumbe,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! SarahStierch (talk) 16:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
|
Welcome!
[edit]Hello! I saw you pop up on one of the pages I watch, and your username reminded me of an old favorite of mine, Treasure of Matecumbe. I like your work so far, and like the choice of name! Cheers :) Doc talk 08:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- That is the movie that inspired the username! Matecumbe (talk) 02:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Jane Fonda
[edit]You added some links to Laurel Awards to Jane Fonda. She is not mentioned in the wikilink you provided and you provided no references. I checked a bit in IMDb, which is itself not a reliable source since contributions to it are not fact-checked, and some of the entries you added do not appear there, others were nomination rather than award. Please do not add unsourced information to Wikipedia. I have removed those links again. You are welcome to restore them, corrected as necessary, provided each is accompanied by a reliable source. You should update the Laurel Awards article too if you are going to link to it: currently it is not relevant. --Mirokado (talk) 02:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- The page for the Laurel Awards is a halfway effort and only mentions bit pieces of information on certain categories. That page is not thorough. On the IMDb awards page, 2nd place is considered a win and not a nomination. For 3rd place and below, it is considered a nomination. -Matecumbe (talk) 06:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. About the Laurel Awards article, at the very least it should list each award category, there would be no particular need for a complete listing of every winner, although that would do no harm. At present, it does not even confirm that there was a Laurel Award for comedy (I'm not doubting that, just pointing out that it takes anyone far to long to verify it). About the IMDb page, where does the subtlety about "second place being a win" come from? The IMDb pages I have looked at mention only one winner in each category. What you are saying may well be correct, but you need to provide the reliable sources from which you are taking the information. Also, Jane does not appear at all in the IMDb page for 1962. --Mirokado (talk) 11:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Message sent with Global message delivery.