User talk:Mat Lorn Seeker

August 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Comfort women. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Thank you for asking, Binksternet or Bink, a model wikipedian and expert engineer, I will keep a proper distance from this confrontation. It just goes on forever. After It is hard to balance immoderate arguments and extreme views, thereby I am mentally fatigued. I return to resume editing different genres of Wikipedia.--まとりょーしか (talk) 23:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for usurpation

Hello, まとりょーしか. A request has been made at Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations to usurp, or "take over", your username because another user would like to use it to edit. The changing username guideline allows a username that is not being actively used to be usurped if the user is given an opportunity to object and does not do so.

If you have an email set in your preferences, you should be getting an email from a bureaucrat or changing username clerk explaining how to consent or object to this process.

If you do not object to being renamed to a new username in order for another user to use the name you currently have, please log in and post a reply here saying so (you may also tell us what username you would like to be renamed to, or we will provide you with a generic one).

If you do nothing: the request may be filled shortly, and your account will be moved to a generic username. You may request that it be moved to a new username of your choice at any time.

If you object to being renamed: please log in and make an edit to this page clearly stating that you object to usurpation. Any objection on your part will prevent usurpation.

Please note that even if your current username is usurped, you can still edit and your data will not be lost; your preferences, watchlist, and other user settings will be transferred to a new username.

Thank you for your time.--まとりょーしか (talk) 10:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 11:40, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Plot (narrative) may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|edition=Revised ed.|date=2003-12-01|page=73|language=English|isbn=978-0803287761}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Wales|first=Katie|title=A Dictionary of Stylistics|series=Longman Linguistics|
<Vincent1, Vincent3, Butch, Vincent2>.<ref name="prince"/><ref>{{Cite book|last=Wales|first=Katie|title=A Dictionary of Stylistics|series=Longman Linguistics|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:28, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2018 cryptocurrency crash

The article 2018 cryptocurrency crash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established for one-time event which is sufficiently covered in news media

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 16:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2018 cryptocurrency crash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 cryptocurrency crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 cryptocurrency crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ysangkok (talk) 15:26, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]