User talk:Masterzora

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Masterzora, welcome to Wikipedia!

I noticed nobody had said hi yet... Hi!

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

You might like some of these links and tips:

some General guidance.
Tutorial and the Manual of Style.
Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
Use the Show preview button
Provide an Edit summary
Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
Take a look at Consensus of standards
Create a User page

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alf ^melmac 06:22, 20 October 2005 (UTC).[reply]

FBLA-PBL Category

Hey man, I started a category for FBLA-PBL members on Wikipedia. You can find more information about it here: Category:FBLA-PBL Members on Wikipedia. You can add yourself to the category and add the userbox to your profile.--Metros232 23:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wii quotes

Could we get your opinion on this, please.

Thanks -- Steel359 16:50, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD question: Recombinant text

I have very little experience in AfD matters, and am asking for your input before nominating an article for deletion, because, quite frankly, I do not want to be seen as someone who capriciously nominates articles which do not meet AfD standards.

If you have time, please take a look at this article. It was created by the person who—as the intro asserts—is the very person who coined the term. Most of the edits are by that person. Most, if not all, of the sources link back to this person. I mean, at best it appears to me to constitute OR, at worst, self-promotion. But maybe I'm seeing it wrong. What do you think?

I selected you and many other editors pretty much completely at random; I picked one day's AfD archives, and clicked on the talk pages of the first two or three dozen editors' talk pages I came across. I hope that in using this selection method, I will get editors who are well-versed in AfD policies, yet who also represent a good cross-section of AfD philosophies. I will monitor your talk page for your response. Thanks. Unschool (talk) 07:08, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--JasonMacker (talk) 07:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Harping on JM's Reddit activity is not moving things forward and is only going to end up in you getting blocked. If you want to continue to participate in this, you need to find a more positive mode of doing so. Mangoe (talk) 11:01, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted a significantly more thorough reply on the incident board but I just want to add here that "Harping on JM's Reddit activity" is a severe misrepresentation. I am sure that this is not your own fault and that it is likely based on JasonMacker's own overemphasis of all the wrong points on the ANI. His Reddit activity was only ever a small part, mentioned to establish that he was part of the invasion, whereas all of the actual evidence of his agenda-pushing and rule/policy/guideline violation is on the page itself. As I said, more substantial comment is available on the ANI, though. -- Masterzora (talk) 15:30, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]