Jump to content

User talk:Masterpjz9/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Masterpjz9, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  IZAK 14:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


Deleting Camp Tel Noar

Hi, since you created this article you may want to see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Tel Noar (2nd nomination), best wishes, IZAK 14:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Leno Info

Excuse me but the information is relevant and true as it had just appeared on TV spoken by Leno less than 15 minutes ago. Next time you get want to get harsh with someone try not to make an assumption before you do so. Sepharo 23:45, May 30, 2006

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Masterpjz9,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.2 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that for security reasons, VandalProof's creator requires it's users to have made 250 edits to articles, which you have not. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.

Prodego talk 01:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Museum of Tropical Queensland

Hi, Masterpjz9! I've added some more information about the Museum of Tropical Queensland in order to clarify its notability. Hope this is ok (it's not much yet, but I think it sets the stage for fuller exposition later. Stephen Wilson 06:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

In this case, I'd be inclined to vote keep even if I had not seen the article, based only on the fact that Richard Borcherds, a.k.a. user:r.e.b. created it. Michael Hardy 23:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)