User talk:Mastermindofmusic

Welcome!

Hello, Mastermindofmusic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as How Do Ya Feel, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mister sparky (talk) 16:38, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of How Do Ya Feel

The article How Do Ya Feel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NSONGS, a scour of the internet proves this was not released as a single. did not chart anywhere

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mister sparky (talk) 16:38, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Five discography. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. reverting correct formatting and removing reliable sources is vandalism so stop doing it. as a new editor make yourself familiar with WP:OWN, MOS:DISCOG and WP:MOS Mister sparky (talk) 15:36, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

also, when clean-up tags are added to article do not remove them until the issues are sorted. they are there for a reason. Mister sparky (talk) 16:37, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Don't Fight It Baby

I have nominated Don't Fight It Baby, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Fight It Baby. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mister sparky (talk) 19:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Five discography, you may be blocked from editing. Mister sparky (talk) 20:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Until the Time Is Through, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- WikHead (talk) 20:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mister sparky (talk) 19:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 48 hours, for persistent disruption, including removing maintenance templates, removing an "Article for deletion" notice, etc, continuing despite warnings.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rock The Party (Five song)

A tag has been placed on Rock The Party (Five song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mister sparky (talk) 20:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of one week for disruptive editing, specifically repeatedly making changes without and against consensus and policy. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Daniel Case (talk) 15:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 19:27, 14 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Clear sock puppet of User:KirkleyHigh. –MuZemike 19:27, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/109.153.161.91 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Mister sparky (talk) 15:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]