User talk:Master Of RSPW

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User:WillC, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. -- Rhobite 04:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help offer

Since you are most likely a new user (I am also relatively new), maybe I can help you. If you have any questions just let me know. --Dunlevyd 07:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR Warning at Rec.sport.pro-wrestling

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 05:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 12 hours for violating the 3-revert rule at rec.sport.pro-wrestling. Please discuss changes on the talk page rather than unilaterally reverting against consensus. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "consensus". It's a couple of trolls who used to disrupt the newsgroup rec.sport.pro-wrestling who are now disrupting the Wiki entry for it. They don't want the truth about the newsgroup told, because it implicates them. Their claims about sockpuppets and such are laughable and easily dismissed. Master Of RSPW 17:15, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is indeed a "consensus." Had you bothered to look back far enough on the history of the talk page (and even the contribution page for the entry itself), you would have seen that your attempted revert was already declared inappropriate and inaccurate by no less than four Wikipedia administrators; however, given that this WAS the version you were reverting to, I imagine you were aware of it and just attempting to cause trouble as you usually do. For now, you should make up your mind who you want to post as, Chadbryant or Master Of RSPW. Please pick one or the other but not both, thanks. --FARVA 07:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]