User talk:Master Editor 10

Hello, Master Editor 10, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 18:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

June 2022

Thanks for contributing to the article James Hockenhull. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 17:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What was unsourced? The article was already there that he would take office in May. It is now June. I guess I can attach his bio on the MOD page that states he took office in May. I presumed the article from MOD saying he would take office in May was enough. Master Editor 10 (talk) 17:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the bio is fine because it says he was appointed "with effect from May 2022". Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 18:11, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Master Editor 10 (talk) 18:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question

@Dormskirk: I made a page the other day for the incoming US Navy senior enlisted leader (MCPON). I was wondering if you would be able to review it for me? Draft:James Honea You seem like someone with experience making pages, so I was wondering if you could give me your thoughts and opinions on the page. Feel free to make any edits to it that you see fit. Thanks, Master Editor 10 (talk) 18:20, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - It looks a nice article: it needs a reference on "He is also a graduate from the U.S. Air Force Senior Non-Commissioned Officer Academy." I am aware that US military biographies often have lists of decorations but they can be troublesome because they are difficult to reference. I hope that helps. Dormskirk (talk) 18:26, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The graduate from the USAF NCO Academy was mentioned in the biographies elsewhere in the article. I will add the in-line citation to that line as well. Regarding the decorations, I just pulled up the most recent picture of him and copied the ribbons in. That is what pretty much all US military biographies do for the ribbons and badges. I don't know if any of them have citations for that. Thank you so much. Master Editor 10 (talk) 18:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blog/forums sources

Hi, please do not add references to blogs, forums, or other unreliable sources, as you did here (to newmyroyals.com). Thank you. JoelleJay (talk) 23:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Knight Bachelor

Hey, figured this would be easier than edit notes. The award of Knight Bachelor carries no official post nominals, the ‘Kt’ is only a reference note that originated within the Imperial Society, this is now leached onto Wikipedia unfortunately, but it’s use is inaccurate. The cabinet office also state it has no offical post nominal - [1]. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 07:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Honea has been accepted

James Honea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gbawden (talk) 13:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1

File:Royal Standard of the Heir Apparent of the United Kingdom.png Master Editor 10 (talk) 17:16, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Skjoldbro (talk) 09:58, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Master Editor 10. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 12:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comments at the SPI regarding this block's length. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 12:47, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Master Editor 10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The only evidence I have that I have not used multiple accounts is I can log out and make a comment here on my talk page with my computer and show you it is not that IP address. The SPI comments state I live in Phoenix, Arizona, when I live in Mesa, Arizona. If it is calculating the entire Phoenix Metro area, there ae over 4,000,000 people living here, and I would imagine there are even more IP addresses. There are also probably close to 1,000,000 people who graduated from my High School. I know there are many people interested in the royal family. I thought I just found a friend who liked a lot of the things I liked. Master Editor 10 (talk) 12:57, 21 November 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

Well, the IP server might be located in Phoenix ... that's what we usually go by.

But that's a relatively minor part of this. The more important part is that your offer of proof that you aren't the accused sock is to us, as it would be to anyone familiar with how the Internet works, meaningless: Anyone could do that (which you can't because the IP is blocked) and claim that shows they're not the same person. IPs are not tied to an individual person; they couldn't be. And anyone could run out to, say, their nearby library, and say that's their "real" IP address. Or you could be coordinating with someone else. It's just too unreliable to be an authenticator. We make our sockpuppetry decisions based on technical and behavioral evidence beyond IP addresses (and while I know something about how the former works, I certainly cannot tell you specifically, but I can tell you that it isn't just your IP address that gives you away, sometimes even if you think you're hidden behind a proxy).

In the end all you have is your word, and we're very sorry if it makes you feel bad but we do not believe we can take it (well, to be fair, we can't take anyone''s. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:48, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Master Editor 10 (talk) 12:57, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It won't let me make a comment to prove to you 68.14.208.126 is not my IP address when I log out, but when I googled "What is my IP address?" it says it is 70.190.68.26. Master Editor 10 (talk) 13:02, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which also resolves to the Phoenix area ... amazing! Daniel Case (talk) 07:49, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]