[20220903] <Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style>

[
To add comments, go to [ ./pool ]. ]

MasterQuestionable, I've seen what you've added to <Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style> and have not responded.
What you've written is very unclear and though there may be meaning in it, I haven't taken the time and energy to figure it out.

Please try to ask questions or make suggestions in the same way others do.
That's our mode of communication and we've found that it works.

What's there is difficult to respond to and looks like trolling.
If that's what it is, people are doing the right thing and ignoring it.

If you actually have something to say, please say it clearly.
Thank you and welcome to Wikipedia.

- SchreiberBike | ⌨ 18:59, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the 1st relatively helpful reply.

    [ Quote SchreiberBike @ CE 2022-09-03 18:59 UTC:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?diffonly=1&diff=prev&oldid=1108319424
    What you've written is very unclear and though there may be meaning in it, I haven't taken the time and energy to figure it out. ]
<^>    Too Long Didn't Read..?
    Would you mind hinting the details about those unclear?

    [ Quote (previous):
    Please try to ask questions or make suggestions in the same way others do.
    That's our mode of communication and we've found that it works. ]
<^>    I tried my best.
    But I don't believe writing everything in one-liner would help things.

    [ Quote (previous):
    What's there is difficult to respond to and looks like trolling.
    If that's what it is, people are doing the right thing and ignoring it. ]
<^>    Difficult to respond, primarily because it rendered the irrationality of mentioned things so apparent: that would be almost pointless to argue.
    Trolling with factual validity probably cannot be simply considered trolling.

    [ Quote (previous):
    If you actually have something to say, please say it clearly. ]
<^>    I believe all my statements are expressed clearly.
    Probably you would have to take effort and investigate things, if anything still doesn't make much sense to you.

----

For your convenience, you may just question whatever bewildering about the incident:
I shall then give answers tailored specifically for the questions.

- MasterQuestionable (talk) 22:21, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just so there's no doubt

I've archived the thread you opened at <Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style> because, to be frank, you seem completely unable to communicate other than in incomprehensible riddles.
I don't know what's going on with you, but you've been wasting everyone's time there.

- E Eng 23:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    [ Quote EEng @ CE 2022-09-03 23:30 UTC:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?diffonly=1&diff=prev&oldid=1108360627
    You appear either to be unable to communicate coherently, or simply to be trolling. ]
<^>    This would be the very comment I'd like to give to you.

Is such [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style?action=history&offset=20220903233202&limit=2 ] abusive behavior?

    [ Quote EEng @ CE 2022-09-03 23:44 UTC:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?diffonly=1&diff=prev&oldid=1108362147
    ... completely unable to communicate other than in incomprehensible riddles. ]
<^>    Your inability to read doesn't mean the posted are non-sense.
    And probably the feigned inability to read: as it appears you can reasonably parse one-liners adequately well.

    [ Quote (previous):
    I don't know what's going on with you, ... ]
<^>    "Hyphen-Traumas" is a valid problem, and should be taken into considerations designing the MoS.

- MasterQuestionable (talk) 01:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will you stop fucking with stuff and find something useful to do?

    [ Quote EEng @ CE 2022-09-25 02:00:59 UTC:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?diffonly=1&diff=prev&oldid=1112178812
    Will you stop fucking with stuff and find something useful to do? ]
<^>    The edits [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style?action=history&offset=20220925013051&limit=4 ] all involved valid things; and provided useful information.

Strictly anything is useful, meanwhile useless.
Realizing this futility, meanwhile still paving forth: probably merely for the experience.

- MasterQuestionable (talk) 10:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]