User talk:MasterPlaster.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/IconoplastDesignsInc. for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 18:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

You have been blocked for a period of 12 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 18:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|is the 12-hour block up yet? I will repost the Iconoplast Desgins page, without "spamming" this time, because it's an important piece of information, and I resolve to make useful contributions and to avoid conflicts of interest

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MasterPlaster. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

is the 12-hour block up yet? I will repost the Iconoplast Desgins page, without "spamming" this time, because it's an important piece of information, and I resolve to make useful contributions and to avoid conflicts of interest.

Decline reason:

User's stated intention to repost the page indicates user does not understand block rationale. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You will not be unblocked if you intend to repost the article. Please familiarize yourself with our conflict of interest guidelines; we are not allowed to put up articles about subjects with which we are closely involved. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 16:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment I also think the user needs to promise to stick with one account and also not insert the link to Iconoplast's website into many articles, which is also spam. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 17:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should also bear in mind that if necessary, URLs persistently inserted may be blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites. WilliamH (talk) 20:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MasterPlaster. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the block rationale, but I still think that the work done on these theatres should be historically noted. On the One King West page, the architects are noted, I though it would be fine to note other contributors. I don't think it necessary to delete the entire page. As for the usernames, I promise not to sign in again with another username. Please reconsider putting the page back up. I will not spam it in other websites, nor will I edit it with the intention of promoting this company.

Decline reason:

moot Block has already expired— Selket ^Talk 17:17, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 19:57, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this was just one in the series of inappropriate edits/spam. Have seen no indication user has learned from previous block. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 20:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet case closed

Please respect the warning in my concluding comment at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/IconoplastDesignsInc.. If you resume editing, I strongly recommend that you avoid anything to do with your company or its business, and edit in a completely unrelated topic. Yechiel (Shalom) 03:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]