User talk:MasterAlBrazil

MasterAlBrazil, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MasterAlBrazil! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. MasterAlBrazil (^Talk/_Contribs) 16:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just asking

What's your relationship with MasterAlSpain? ^{Babymissfortune} 12:04, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have contributed in wikipedia since I created my page on December 4th 2018. But MasterAlSpain never create his page. MasterAlBrazil (^Talk/_Contribs) 12:10, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in infoboxes

I have noticed you have been adding or changing flags, as seen in this change to Ángel Nieto Team. Please note Wikipedia does not generally allow flags in infoboxes, although many editors do not comply. More information can be found at WP:INFOBOXFLAG. Thank you.--86.29.222.228 (talk) 03:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why Flags were deleted in infoboxes? MasterAlBrazil (^Talk/_Contribs) 03:11, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They should not be there. Your changes are not those of a new user. Have you edited Wikipedia previously, using a different name?--86.29.222.228 (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I came from Brazil, but MasterAlSpain comes from Spain. MasterAlBrazil (^Talk/_Contribs) 03:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of rhythm guitarists

Hello. Your recent edit to List of rhythm guitarists appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also - as it clearly says in each section of List of lead guitarists:-

"This list is for lead guitarists with their own Wikipedia articles. Red links and links to band articles will be removed"

which is why your addition there was deleted - Arjayay (talk) 11:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why Ken Susi and Buz McGrath from Unearth are played lead and rhythm duties? ^{MasterAlBrazil} 12:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marking edits as minor

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Dan Linfoot, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor".

Anything which changes the meaning of the words should not be marked as minor. Please also explain your changes in the edit summary - "tweak" in not appropriate where content has been deleted. --86.29.222.228 (talk) 03:41, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is tweak? ^{MasterAlBrazil} 03:44, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I now need to go through your edits again to change what errors you have left, such as at Josh Brookes where you have jumped from 2017 to 2019, and at Shane Byrne (motorcyclist), where you have decided he is retired, but have not added a citation and I cannot see anything on the internet. If you continue, you may get warnings.

Tweak is a small change, such as honda to Honda - understand? I now have to sleep.--86.29.222.228 (talk) 04:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ^{MasterAlBrazil} 04:03, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changing internal links

It is not necessary to change links, as you have done here. This is done automatically when the articles are re-named, see Jason O'Halloran where both links show up at the top - both are correct. It will come easier after the first five years.......8¬) --86.29.222.228 (talk) 04:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why its changed from motorcycle racer to motorcyclist in article pages? ^{MasterAlBrazil} 04:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorcycling#Article title qualifiers where it was decided by consensus in March/April 2018 to use, as a general rule, the word 'motorcyclist', and change the article title where necessary. Changing the name of an article leaves behind an automatic redirect, so Shane Byrne (motorcycle racer) becomes Shane Byrne (motorcyclist) with both versions still working.--00:32, 2 January 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.222.228 (talk)

Happy New Year

❇ Wikipedia Pronounce Happy New Year ❇ 🍾🍻✨ 2019 🎇🎉🎊 ^{MasterAlBrazil} 11:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:MasterAlBrazil/sandbox8

Luke Dimension
Holly — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.34.81.214 (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello, there. Hi... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.162.254.245 (talk) 09:40, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grand Prix motorcycle racing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miguel Oliveira (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Your recent editing history at 2021 MotoGP World Championship shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 03:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:MUSICBIO, lacks any reliable independent sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:MasterAlBrazil/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:MasterAlBrazil/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 12:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:MasterAlBrazil/sandbox

Hello, MasterAlBrazil. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:MasterAlBrazil/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:27, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:MasterAlBrazil/sandbox

Hello, MasterAlBrazil. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:50, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]