User talk:Mashine1984

Welcome!

Hello, Mashine1984, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Bulgaria Air have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:01, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Defense industry of Bulgaria, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:00, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Mashine1984. You have new messages at Jetstreamer's talk page.
Message added 17:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

https://www.air.bg/en/co-branded-card I've nothing to say if this is also called not relevant!!! It's from the official Bulgaria Air website!!! I think that Jetstreamer have some interest of not showing it!!!

Air Lazur

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Air Lazur, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.airlazur.com/en/about_us/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:18, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Air Lazur

Already dealt with by @Tokyogirl79:, located at Draft:Air Lazur. Giant Snowman 13:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC) @GiantSnowmane, thanks, buddy! :)[reply]

Bulgaria Air

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bulgaria Air. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jetstreamer, I assume you're reffering to the Boeing 737-300 (LZ-BOT). Actually I was expecting you to critise me for this, but trust me I'm following the process all the way. The problem with the official information is coming from the media policy of Bulgaria Air which is CRAP... Anyway this is an aircraft owned by Bulgaria Air which was stored at Sofia Airport. From TODAY it's back on service and will be like this for the next 1 year until the wet leasing of the 2 A320's to Onur Air is finished. I don't know if you follow and if have followed what is happening in Bulgaria Air in the last 2 months, but on their carrers page they were looking for 737 captains. The hole Idea is that the 733 will operate mainly on their summer charter program.

Well that is all very nice, but is there a reference for this information? It doesn't have to be from the airline - actually it is better if it is a newspaper or something like that, it can be in Bulgarian. YSSYguy (talk) 06:26, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a picture from this morning http://s991.photobucket.com/user/Geleto59/media/LZ-BOT-28-April--2015_zpszhqkyomm.jpg.html

I've reverted the last edit [1] that included the link above. Unfortunately, images are not considered reliable sources. Furthermore, no inline citations have been provided for the addition. We need to use sources like Flight International for this.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 10:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've reinstated your edit [2]. There's good faith from you and I want to show that I have no intentions to war over this. I'll just place a {{cn}} tag in the entry. I'm pretty sure you'll find a good source for this. Regards.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 10:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, buddy! I just want the information to be relevant all the time. Sorry for not adding citation sometimes, but not always there is a Press Release...

You must nave references, saying "I know..." is not acceptable for Wikipedia. If you cannot find references, you cannot make the changes, it is simple as that. There are many many things I know about Australian airlines, but if I don't find sources, the information I know cannot and does not go in the articles. If Bulgaria Air operated an ATR 42, you must provide a source. If one of the A319s has left the fleet, you must provide a source or wait until planespotters.net says that this is the case. If an aircraft is stored, it is not in the fleet. I think you misunderstand what "retired" means, it is not for listing individual aircraft. If there is one aircraft operating, that type of aircraft is not retired, so the stored 737-300 should not be listed as being in the fleet and the 737-300 should not be listed as retired either. Is there a Bulgarian aviation magazine available? That might he helpful. Cheers. YSSYguy (talk) 03:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi YSSYguy, so, let us start from the begging. Regarding the ATR you have removed it from retired fleet without any explanation. According to what you said, I've put as "Stored" as it is it's real status in Bulgaria Air at the moment. Regarding the second Boeing 737-300, it's going under maintenence at the moment at Lufthansa Techinik Sofia and it will enter shortly service. Second, one of the A319's have been leased back to the leasing company more than 1 month ago. Unfortunately official information from the Bulgaria Air haven't been issued, because of BAD MEDIA POLICY. Third in Bulgaria unfortuantely we don't have good media's which are providing with the relevant information. So, if we need to wait for planespotters to update it, it might take another month or 2. I think it's not acceptable that the information will be irrelevant for the next 2 month, because of the stupid "referrence rule". If you don't trust my information regarding the A319 you might call Bulgaria Air and ask them if this is so, or not. If you want keep it like this, I don't give a f*ck. I don't like loosing my time on stupid "battles"...

I said many times in the edit summaries why the info about the ATR was removed - because it was unsourced. You have provided no evidence that Bulgaria Air ever operated an ATR 42, other than "I know". You need to find a source. If there is a source about the ATR, then when it is mentioned in the article it should be in the Retired section, because it is not operating. If there is a Boeing 737-300 in the hangar and it has been out of the fleet for a long time, then it is not in the fleet either. When it commences operations again and there is a source that says so, then it can be included in the fleet table. You have provided no evidence that an A319 has left the fleet other than "I know". Planespotters.net says it hasn't left, but maybe there is another website that says it has; maybe there is another website that says Bulgaria air once operated an ATR 42. The fleet total in the infobox should just be a number, there should be no text about how many aircraft are stored or how many aircraft are on order. There is no "stupid rule" over referencing, there is only a hard policy. If you don't want to follow the policy, sooner or later someone will block you. YSSYguy (talk) 10:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@YSSYguy, are kidding me??? Are you nuts or what? See the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Btxdv_BBWiw also find the info about the ATR42-300 inn Bulgaria Air magazine https://www.air.bg/content/magazine/pdf/435500754.pdf (Bulgaria, too, figures in the history of the ATr 42. The fleet of Bulgaria Air and Hemus Air boasts two ATr 42-300s (LZATrand LZ-ATS) configured to carry 46 and 48 passengers, respectively) and tell me againg that they've never operted an ATR 42... About the A319 you will see that it's been leased back, but of course you're waiting for Planespotters which ridiculous, but anyway we will have wrong information for the next 1-2-3 months :D

SkyGreece service to JFK

I removed the end date. If this flight is going seasonal and resuming next March then the end date is not needed as per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT. Regards! 97.85.113.113 (talk) 19:03, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ryanair new services

Per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT, all new routes must have a exact date (officially announced or not). Please discuss at WT:AIRPORT if you disagree. 97.85.113.113 (talk) 19:03, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Formatting

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add references to articles, it would help if you could enhance the reference by formatting it correctly. You can do this by using the "cite web" template.

Thank you, ReflinkerMS ^Reflinker 09:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hi, I'm Wjkxy! I noticed that you added new flights at Athens International Airport without citing a reliabe source, WP:AIRPORTS states: "For future destinations, add: "(begins date service begins)" after the destination. Starting dates must be provided with full date including the year and references should be provided." So I kindly ask you to add a source next to new flights, to show readers and other editors that what you added is true.
Thank you. Wjkxy (talk) 17:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 23 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the David the Builder Kutaisi International Airport page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm NYCRuss. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bulgarian Air Charter, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This is about adding the IATA category to this airline, which is not a member.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mashine1984. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

So, after all who was right and who was wrong??? lol

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mashine1984. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong place

Hi there. If you want to contact a user, please edit on their Talk page, not their User page. Please see User talk:Charlesdrakew as opposed to User:Charlesdrakew, from which latter I have removed your edit. Hope this helps; best wishes DBaK (talk) 22:56, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Sofia Airport. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Charles (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? What promotional materials?

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sofia Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 08:07, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Sofia Airport. Charles (talk) 08:10, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Sofia Airport. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SovalValtos (talk) 09:53, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a dicussion which concerns you at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism.Charles (talk) 09:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 14:43, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint about Sofia Airport at WP:AN3

Hello Mashine1984. Though the report doesn't mention your name, you might be interested in the complaint at the edit warring noticeboard, since you have recently edited the article. You can comment on the report if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 17:35, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Sofia Airport. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SovalValtos (talk) 18:02, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Sofia Airport. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 14:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mashine1984. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Sofia Airport. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SovalValtos (talk) 11:05, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sofia Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 17:22, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Sofia Airport. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 15:27, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sofia Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Provide an edit summary the next time you undo another users edits in the future. Ajf773 (talk) 18:58, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sofia Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SovalValtos (talk) 19:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check website of SkyUp Mashine1984 (talk) 19:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bulgaria Air, you may be blocked from editing. You have multiple warnings regarging the addition of unsourced material. The latest addition you made is not supported by any source in the article. Jetstreamer ^Talk 19:06, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source is added accordingly. I think Jetstreamer shall be blocked from editing.

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]