User talk:Mashby1228
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Mashby1228, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 02:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Article: Noise Dosimeter for peer review
[edit]A noise or sound dose is the amount of sound a person is exposed to in a day. The dose is represented by a percentage. A noise dose of 100% means that a person has exceeded the permissible amount of noise. Any noise exposure after the 100% noise dose may damage hearing.
Mashby1228 (talk) 02:32, 10 November 2018 (UTC) Morgan
Morgan- I think it would be beneficial to the wikipedia page if you added information about exchange rate to your edits. Explaining what exchange rate means, how it is used, and possibly providing information about what the exchange rates are for different organizations would be beneficial to the reader. Overall nice job! Very easy to read and understand Sara.hartson (talk) 02:54, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Resposes to my peer reviews: Thank you to my classmates for the peer review. I will add information about exchange rate.
Thank you Dr. Meinke for the review and help with my topic. I will add PEL/AL for the various organizations.
Mashby1228 (talk) 02:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
ARTICLE REVIEW
[edit]Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything is relevant but seems to be missing some information.
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? What else could be improved?
It seems as if this article has not been updated in a long time. For example, the pictures are not of modern technology. There could be information about dose
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I think the article is neutral and unbiased.
Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
Noise dosimeter talk page: The link given is broken for Ref: "Noise Dosimeters, Handbook of Noise and Vibration Control". John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2008-04-08. Retrieved 2014-12-04.
Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
Yes, somem on OSHA standards and guides about dosimeters.
What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
N/A
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? The article is now part of our educational course.