User talk:Masha Ukraina

Welcome!

Hello, Masha Ukraina, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Enrico dos Santos, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Enrico dos Santos

The article Enrico dos Santos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to User talk:Sir Sputnik could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 05:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Masha.Ukraina (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{| why i should be unblocked is because i was trying to explain something and it got misconstrued as a threat. In addition to all this, is it fair that other than the person responsible (i.e Sir Sputnik) other wikipedia users come in and accuse me without having an impartial discussion??? i have reached out to Sir Sputnik for assistance and i do not blame him instead i wrote to him thanking him for his feedback and help. Being a new user, i think that i shouldnt be harshly judged for something i was simply trying to do and that was share information with my fellow wikipedia friends. ````

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masha Ukraina (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why i should be unblocked is because i was trying to explain something and it got misconstrued as a threat. In addition to all this, is it fair that other than the person responsible (i.e Sir Sputnik) other wikipedia users come in and accuse me without having an impartial discussion??? i have reached out to Sir Sputnik for assistance and i do not blame him instead i wrote to him thanking him for his feedback and help. Being a new user, i think that i shouldnt be harshly judged for something i was simply trying to do and that was share information with my fellow wikipedia friends.````

Decline reason:

You are not allowed to open multiple accounts to continue your disputes, and you will need to address that if you want any chance of being unblocked. You should also make unblock requests on your original account, whichever one that is. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.