User talk:Maryhedengren

Welcome!

Hello, Maryhedengren, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 06:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Rhetoric Society Quarterly

A tag has been placed on Rhetoric Society Quarterly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 06:10, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rhetoric Society of America

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rhetoric Society of America, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 06:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Rhetoric Society of America

A tag has been placed on Rhetoric Society of America requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 02:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rhetoric Society of America

I have nominated Rhetoric Society of America, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhetoric Society of America. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Riotrocket8676 ^{You gotta problem with that?} 02:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Look (fashion movement) has been accepted

American Look (fashion movement), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 16:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Maryhedengren! I enjoyed your American Look article very much, although I think it deals with a subject that is already covered in Sportswear (fashion). I am merging most of your article into that article using your references (was able to find some of them on Google Books) which I hope is OK. I also don't think "The American Look" was an official/universal term in the same way that The New Look became - it doesn't appear to be as well documented or as widely/consistently used, despite the name of Rebecca Arnold's book and the term popping up in several publications and texts. I would suggest that it would be better as a redirect to the Sportswear (fashion) page unless you can expand it significantly enough to stand separately on its own merits. Mabalu (talk) 17:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mabalu I'm glad you liked it. It's been a year since I wrote that article, so the sportswear might have changed since I searched for and could not find information on the American Look. Part of the reason why American Look is more than just sportswear--fashion, yes, but also things like dental care, as pointed out in the chapter cited therein. That being said, I bow to your expertise in the fashion department. Maryhedengren (talk) 18:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One observation I'd make is that it definitely wasn't a McCardell introduction - although she was a major player in the field and did become a major player in defining the fashionable side of things. Do take a look at the Sportswear article to see how I've merged your work, I'd like to know if you have any thoughts. Mabalu (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]