User talk:Maryang

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mary Yang. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Versus22_talk 13:23, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page Mary Yang constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 13:26, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Mary Yang, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not make wholesale deletions of article text without explanation. If you have concerns about the article, discuss them at Talk:Mary Yang. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 13:32, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mary Yang. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 13:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding an edit summary to your last edit! I have let your removal of the unsourced material stand. However, for the two items which are cited in independent sources, you will need to explain further how those sources are inaccurate. —C.Fred (talk) 13:38, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If there is something wrong with the Mary Yang article, you need to discuss it at Talk:Mary Yang or raise the issue at WP:ANI or WP:HD or even WP:OFFICE. Removing the content entirely is not acceptable without an explanation. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 13:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The Selected works section appears to be valid; you will need to raise more specific concerns before removing it. —C.Fred (talk) 13:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fresh start

Hi, are you the subject of the article? Thanks! KillerChihuahua^?!? 15:22, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry we seem to have got our wires crossed here. Tim Vickers (talk) 06:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion on deleting this page

Mary, may I offer a suggestion? These admins won't let you remove this directly. Try contacting the Wikimedia Foundation, and ask them to remove it. If they are reasonable people, they will help you. (Don't feel bad if you have problems, a LOT of people with unwanted biographies on Wikipedia have troubles. The policies for biographies are not well set up, and being argued over.) The contact info is here. --Eric Barbour (talk) 04:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting article

Hi, it seems that you might be the subject of one of our articles and are displeased with some of the contents. See Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Factual error (from subject) for a general overview of ways to get problems fixed (as well as an email address). You can also mention specific problems on Talk: Mary Yang if you want specific mistakes corrected.

The email address is info-en-q@wikimedia.org. The first thing you might be asked to do is to privately establish your identity. Toddst1 (talk) 06:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]