User talk:Marvzi

Revertings

You are currently reverting without a discussion and without an edit summary. You have reverted sourced material twice on Tell Abyad and on Rojava where it is sourced that Kurdistan according to sever did not include any part of Syria. This is disruptive editing and need to be stopped. If you have objections then go to the talk page of the articles. Remember that Rojava is under 1R rule. Any further reversion on that page on your side will cause you to be blocked for violating the rule.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 15:48, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Report notice

User Multi-gesture was a new user, yet he knew about suckpuppetry, IP checks ! Sourcing, reverting and many other things that would take a real new Wikipedia user a long time to understand. Weird, dont you think ?? And after he got permanently blocked, here we have you, with the same style.. hmmmmmm

For now, I will just report the breaking of 1R rule, and then Im gonna go ahead with my case of suckpuppetry. Thanks you.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reported

Ok multi-gesture puppet, you were reported here [[1]].--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

???--Marvzi (talk) 16:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

This didnt happen in Syrian Jazira. Iraq and Deir ez zor are not part of the PYD occupied regions. This irrelevant text has no place in the article. DO NOT engage in edit wars. This time you can be blocked without even going to ANI. It has been made very clear to you that you dont belong in Wikipedia and you need to think about this.. This isnt a PKK forum.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 01:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. If you are sure about what you are saying, so there's no need for threatening and using this kind of language, otherwise this means that you are not sure about yourself. Now, I have no doubt that the one who doesn't belong in here is you. -- Marvzi (talk) 01:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reported again

You have been reported here User_talk:Magog_the_Ogre#Racist_Vandal_Sockpuppet_is_back.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 02:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rojave 1 revert

Stop putting your finger on the "Undo" Button. You dont have this privilege. Dont you have in your mind the capacity to understand the concept of relevance ?? An article about PKK occupied Syrian regions has nothing to do with what ISIS did in Iraq and Deir-ezzor or Raqqa. Even if its sourced its still irrelevant.

The article is under 1 revert per 24 hours rule. But, this rule have an exception which is blocked users.. You added this text as your sock-puppet Multi-Gesture here, and now you are restoring it but you are the same user even with a different account so reverting you even a hundred revert per day is OK. But if you reverted (and I know you will) then you will have breached the 1 revert per 24 hours and I will see you at the ANI with your whole history which will guarantee that you will leave Wikipedia for good.

I also ask you as a formality to use the talk page of the article (but this is hopeless).--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 23:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marvzi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to know the reason of my indefinite blockade? User:Attar-Aram syria obviously has a hateful and disgusting mentality, so this user is not in a position to protest me or other users about the edits. Many articles here need to be corrected to reflect the facts, and someone is needed to work on them to neutralize the poorly-sourced hateful and racist propaganda on the articles, and add the other-side's ideas, too. To have an idea about this user's vandalism, look at this user's latest engagement in edit war with me! Marvzi (talk) 16:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks are not considered. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I wonder how the administrators consider the blocking requests containing personal attacks but not the unblocking requests. No problem, I make a new one. -- Marvzi (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Attar-Aram: I will not counter attack this rant but will only give a summary of this user abusive racist history which is collected here in the talk page of the admin who blocked Marvzi : User talk:Magog the Ogre#Racist Vandal Sockpuppet is back

I specially advice the reviewing admin to take a look at Marvzi case in the ANI which actually deal with his behavior using a sock puppet called Multi-Gesture Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive890#Rojava_ethnic_warring

I even told him that I reported him to an admin here and he didnt bother to defend himself.. All he do is revert.

Cheers.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 17:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What you said on that admin's talk page exactly confirms my saying that you have a hateful and disgusting mentality. -- Marvzi (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marvzi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to know the reason of my indefinite blockade? User:Attar-Aram syria, because of the repulsive language and mentality, obviously is not in a position to protest me or other users about the edits. Many articles here need to be corrected to reflect the facts, and someone is needed to work on them to neutralize the poorly-sourced hateful and racist propaganda on the articles, and to add the other-side's ideas, too. To have an idea about this user's latest edit wars against me, look at this user's latest reverting of my edits! -- Marvzi (talk) 19:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked for recycling the previous request and for personal attacks. MER-C 20:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wow! That's crazy.

Did you read my request? It's not the same as the last one.

If it's OK I'm gonna make another request. -- 81.4.121.126 (talk) 20:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had every right to revert you because you were restoring a text entered by your indefinitely blocked sock puppet. Reverting blocked users is not edit warring. P.S : Stop attacking my mentality and stop mentioning me.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 19:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I remember you gave me a different reason in the reverting summary. Sorry but apart from your mentality, I think your memory also has a problem. -- Marvzi (talk) 19:51, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marvzi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear admins! My blockade wasn't fair. I bet the last two admins didn't even read my request, and they decided in a hurry. I only want to know the reason of my indefinite blockade? I believe that User:Attar-Aram syria is not in a position to protest about the edits (I have already explained why). Many articles here need to be corrected to reflect the facts, and someone is needed to work on them to neutralize the poorly-sourced hateful and racist propaganda on the articles, and add the other-side's ideas, too. It's helpful to take a look at his/her latest edit wars against me! -- 81.4.121.126 (talk)

Decline reason:

Dear Marvzi! You should probably read WP:NOTTHEM if you expect to be unblocked any time soon! OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh god stop bringing me here. Anyway, you cant add an neutrality considering the kind of behavior you showed when editing as your sock puppet Multi-gesture. I refer to the case in the ANI which led to Multi-gesture indefinite block Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive890#Rojava_ethnic_warring.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 21:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your referring doesn't help anymore because you are solely the only one who has a problem with my editing habits. If you ask me about the reason, I think maybe because of your mentality. -- 81.4.121.126 (talk) 21:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This stupid troll (Marvzi, Multi-Gesture, whatsoever) is continously vandalising in the Kemalism article, jeez. -- 91.113.116.64 (talk) 23:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]