User talk:Marvin Herndon

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to J. Marvin Herndon, without either resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Thank you.--CyberGhostface (talk) 01:28, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stellar ignition article

The article at stellar ignition was largely (if not entirely) constructed to display one particular viewpoint/theory that has yet to reach mainstream acceptance. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. The article's title implies that it should give a comprehensive coverage of the subject and not one theory. Also, your edits on it constitute a clear conflict of interest. Please avoid making substantial changes on subjects where a COI exists, such as articles about yourself, your work/research, your colleagues, etc. Making such edits will generally slip you away from neutral point of view. I may try to incorporate some of the information onto the current star formation article. Thanks. Cquan ^{(after the beep...)} 15:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further review, I see no content from the article that does not simply serve to advance your theory or is not already represented on other articles (background info). You're free to make edits to the star formation article, but you really need to keep WP:COI in mind. Thus far your theories are unsupported by indepedent secondary sources. While you are allowed to cite your own work, you should only do so in limited cases and not as the basis for the entire subject matter. Thanks. Cquan ^{(after the beep...)} 14:05, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamo theory

Please read WP:COI as you appear to be adding and promoting your own ideas/research on dynamo theory and other articles. Wikipedia is not the place to promote our own work. Vsmith (talk) 01:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Use talk pages for talk

Please don't put conversation on peoples user pages. Thats what talk pages are for. I've removed it William M. Connolley (talk) 20:56, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamo theory II

a) I've reverted your edits, because you described your own theory in that article. This is not allowed. b) You included your own works as primary sources. However, primary sources allone are not sufficient - is there any secondary source, published in an reputable scientific journal, which refers to your theory? c) For more infos, see: Wikipedia:PSTS#Preference for secondary sources: Articles are preferably based on secondary sources, rather than primary or tertiary ones. d) See also Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline: If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable.
PS: Thanks for the infos on Hilgenberg.
PS-2: If you write a comment on a talk page, pleas write it a the end of the page, not at the beginning. --D.H (talk) 08:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A) You wrote: I published the discovery of the mistake and the concept of georeactor operant fluid for dynamo action in 2007. Removal of my edits for the reasons you stated would be fundamentally wrong as it would now intentionally mislead the wiki-readership.

You see, there is a great problem: The only question I have is stated in Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline: Is there a "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." So we are only talking about your new modification of a well known theory: dynamo theory.

B) As long your modification of dynamo theory is not widely discussed in the scientific community, the article Georeactor is the better place for your thesis. So I created a new section in Georeactor#Dynamo theory and inserted your edits from dynamo theory. I hope that's OK for your now. If I made some errors while copying the text, please correct them. Regards, --D.H (talk) 08:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a) I've inserted a link to Georeactor in your biographic article J. Marvin Herndon.

b) As I said above: It is not the decision of Wikipedia authors to judged whether a theory is true or not. We must rely on reputable secondary sources. So as long your correction of dynamo theory is not widely discussed, mentioning your theory in that article simply violates the Wikipedia policies. However, I've inserted a link to your theory in Dynamo theory#See also.

c) Please see also the discussion in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whole-Earth decompression dynamics. And I've inserted a link to your paper into Expanding Earth theory#External links. --D.H (talk) 11:06, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Those were my last edits on topics related to your theories. So if you think they are wrong please delete them - although I think my edits are NPOV. I hope you will find support for your theories in the near future. --D.H (talk) 15:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Vom wachsenden Erdball.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vom wachsenden Erdball.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of J. Marvin Herndon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article J. Marvin Herndon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Marvin Herndon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

Thanks for your mail. I don't see anything in it that is private, though, and would prefer to discuss it openly, if you have no objection. If so, please either re-post it here or on my talk page.

William M. Connolley (talk) 14:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:JMHERNDON.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:JMHERNDON.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The creator of the image JMHERNDON.jpg has placed the image in the public domain [Ticket#: 2016071110004085]. "I am the creator and copyright holder of the image File:JMHERNDON.jpg. Previously, I have given Dr. J. Marvin Herndon permission to use that image on his websites and on his Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Marvin_Herndon. I now re-confirm that permission. Moreover, as that image is often used by others, I herewith place that image in the public domain. Please refrain from deleting that image. –Volker Steger."

February 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to J. Marvin Herndon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Stop removing sourced material. Since you have a conflict of interest in this article youshould discuss any proposed changes on the article's talkpage. Meters (talk) 05:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marvin Herndon. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article J. Marvin Herndon, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 06:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]