User talk:Marvel52

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Marvel52, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! McSly (talk) 00:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:Flat Out, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 01:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WTF who has the right to remove a perfectly factual entry, bringing some light into a conflicting page on chemtrails without caring to check the data or contact the paragraph's author! Please replace it asap, or prove me wrong! martin velek

As the contrails are a feature unmasking a combat plane (showing its position, direction and speed), some effort was spent already during the WWII to avoid them, mostly by choosing (if at all possible) a flight level where the condensation of exhaust vapour would not appear. The same unmasking problem beset the high-flying U-2 recce airplanes, where the pilot even got a rear-view mírror to watch for the tell-tale contrail that would give away his position. It was reported that for the stealth aircraft to avoid generating the "traitor" contrails, experiments were conducted with various chemical additives (some reportedly of acid nature) in fuel to prevent the highly reflective ice crystal trails from forming at all. Apparently this has nothing to do with any purpose-created "chemtrails". Yes, it is an air pollution, but due to small number of stealth aircraft flying, there is no substantial danger to environment or human health from this cause.

how on earth can i come into contact with you, please? i feel much upset by your unfounded requirements. presume you would remove the edda saga from here because it was saved in verbal shape only!!!! martin velek

where can i find the bf tildas on my czech keyboard, sir?!

and i am not concocting any dbf novel synthesMarvel52 (talk) 20:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)es, the facts i am using are plain and verifiable for/by somebody, who feels interested. wikipedia is the starting source i wish to be the best and reliable, but not a scientific thesis for a phd.[reply]

Marvel52 (talk) 20:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)== October 2016 == Please do not add or change content, as you did at Junkers, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 19:12, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Junkers. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 19:12, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Marvel52. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the September 11 attacks. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Acroterion (talk) 02:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]