User talk:Martinized
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Michael Martin (writer/editor), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.
September 2008
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Michael Martin (writer/editor) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 12:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Michael Martin (writer/editor) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 13:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
I've declined your request for speedy deletion, as we rarely delete user talk pages. If you wish, you can blank the page entirely; the notices and messages you've received remain in the history, for reference. Best, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 14:02, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Note that that only applies to this page; the article has been deleted, at your request. FYI, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 14:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Larry Stanton has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)December 2016
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Anita Bryant has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Anita Bryant was changed by Martinized (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921094 on 2016-12-24T17:52:39+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:52, 24 December 2016 (UTC)