User talk:Martinakohl

July 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Neve Ativ. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. nableezy - 20:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 20:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Neve Ativ has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 20:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have now violated the 3 revert rule. If you remove the material once more I will report you and ask that you be blocked from editing. nableezy - 21:16, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported to the edit warring noticeboard. You can see this here. nableezy - 21:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Kuru (talk) 02:01, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Martinakohl for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. nableezy - 02:27, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked extended to 2 days

I have reset and extended your block to 2 days per your clear block evasion with Mainmed (talk · contribs). Note that any further disruption, may cause your block to be extended to indefinite. Regards, –MuZemike 02:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

Your block has now been extended to indefinite for extended sock puppetry after abusing another account in Ljoostig (talk · contribs). Regards, –MuZemike 03:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]