User talk:MartinRamos92

Image Tagging for Image:Ongania.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ongania.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: test2

Regarding edits made during July 9 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. PerfectStorm 04:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA World Cup

~~Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Wine Guy Talk 07:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC)~~ [reply]

Sorry, I was mistaken and have reverted back to your version. Please understand that replacing a German flag with a Nazi flag is common act of vandalism, but your edit was absolutly correct; I should have looked more closely. Please forgive the misunderstanding. --Wine Guy Talk 08:10, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked a bit more at the flag issue for 1934, and while the Nazi flag did come into use in 1933, the German Empire flag (

) was in use until 1935. Also, the official poster for the 1934 World Cup shows the German Empire flag. If you disagree, please join the discussion on the talk page before changing it again. Thanks. --Wine Guy Talk 19:37, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling conventions

Please do not change American spellings to British spellings except in articles dealing with specifically British subjects. In articles on subjects not specifically dealing with an English-speaking country (such as Hair color and Attaque 77), both spelling conventions are acceptable, and the established one should be adhered to. Thank you. User:Angr 07:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Spelling Changes Violate Policy

Advice: English dialects on Wikipedia: Wikipedia has millions of readers; some use American English, or British English, or any of numerous other local forms from Australia, Canada, Ireland etc. Because of this, Wikipedia has a policy of respecting articles written in whatever form of English the original author of the article used.

The guidelines are simple. For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, just ask anyone on Wikipedia and they will help you. Thank you. --Cultural Freedom talk 2006-07-13 07:38 (UTC)

S-protection tags

Since you are not an admin, and cannot protect and unprotect pages, please do not remove semi-protection tags from pages that are semi-protected (as you did with Sex), nor add the tag to pages that are not semi-protected (as you did with Semen). Both actions can be considered vandalism. Thank you. User:Angr 07:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PresIsabel.jpg, Image:PresVidela.jpg

Please note that you may not put the tage {{PD-self}} onto images unless you yourself are the photographer. User:Angr 14:10, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:PresBignone.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PresBignone.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Images from Argentine government websites

I'm writing to you regarding Image:PresSaa.jpg. If you won't supply a valid license, the image will be deleted, so please try to do that. Maybe you heard that contents in government websites are always public domain, but that's only true of the United States, not of Argentina. If you took the image from http://www.presidencia.gov.ar/, take a look at this. Images should be uploaded to the Commons whenever possible. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 00:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image changes

Could you explain why you changed some images in Argentina and Demographics of Argentina. You didn't mention it in your edit summaries and I think the previous ones were more representative. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 11:25, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Videla.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Videla.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ilse @ 19:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Videla.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Videla.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ilse @ 23:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Videla.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Videla.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Cristina67.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cristina67.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Isabelita.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Isabelita.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 19:35, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]