User talk:Martijn Hoekstra/Archives/2011/September
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Martijn Hoekstra. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 05 September 2011
- News and notes: 24,000 votes later and community position on image filter still unclear; first index of editor satisfaction appears positive
- WikiProject report: Riding with WikiProject London Transport
- Sister projects: Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Opinion essay: The copyright crisis, and why we should care
- Arbitration report: BLP case closed; Cirt-Jayen466 nearly there; AUSC reshuffle
Nomination of Alex Day for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Day (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lagrange613 (talk) 21:25, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 September 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports on research, Kenya trip, Mumbai Wikiconference; Canada, Hungary and Estonia; English Wikinews forked
- WikiProject report: Politics in the Pacific: WikiProject Australian Politics
- Featured content: Wikipedians explain two new featured pictures
- Arbitration report: Ohconfucius sanctions removed, Cirt desysopped 6:5 and a call for CU/OS applications
- Technology report: What is: agile development? and new mobile site goes live
- Opinion essay: The Walrus and the Carpenter
The Signpost: 19 September 2011
- From the editor: Changes to The Signpost
- News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised
- Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork
- WikiProject report: Back to school
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word
- Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year
Unblock request from the list
- 81.247.24.15 · talk · contribs · block · log · stalk · Robtex · whois · Google · ipcheck · HTTP · geo · rangeblocks · spur · shodan
Hello Martijn. I notice you've been trying to help out the user from the above IP who has posted unblock-en-l. I won't mention their name or organization. This is from a range that was blocked recently by HelloAnnyong per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noisetier. It seems unlikely that the person on the list is the same as Noisetier, who appears to be a pusher of unusual views on certain articles about the Middle East. I think it would be OK to create an account for the person on the list. Is that OK with you? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 22:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, absolutely. Gmail has been a little weird for me recently, by splitting up some threads that clearly belong together, or marking some messages to a thread as spam, when they are clearly not, so if I broke a conversation in a weird way my apologies for that. In case it's a corp user (I can't quickly remember which one it was), I always try to clearly let them know that editing for corporations is difficult bordering to impossible, and point them to WP:COI, WP:NOSHARE and WP:CORPNAME beforehand. It seems unreasonable to, when they ask for an account, accommodate them without comment, and the moment they start editing covering them in the inevitable mountains of warnings for not following those guidelines. As a new member, I would take a polite unblock for a member of a corporation as an endorsement of corporate editing too. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Deletion review for Frederick Glaysher
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Frederick Glaysher. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Radon Detection (talk) 11:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC) -->
Following the instructions, I'm letting you know of this Deletion Review.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Frederick_Glaysher
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2010_May_
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_September_21
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week