User talk:MartianGuru

I will update the article aftre getting more information ..

Speedy deletion of Lala Ram Ken

A tag has been placed on Lala Ram Ken requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, MartianGuru, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Jatav have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 17:30, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

edits

I'm sorry, but I had to revert some of your edits. In this edit you removed a referenced fact without supplying any source saying it is wrong. In these edits you added a fact and as a source used another Wikipedia page, which is not a reliable source. Please only add facts you can cite and don't remove sourced material. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 17:34, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for not providing reference for jatav wiki page. Jatav and chamar are two different castes under Schedule caste category. Jatav is not subcaste of chamar caste.

Please find below the reference from Indian government website which clearly mentions jatav and chamar as separate caste. http://socialjustice.nic.in/scorder1950.php?pageid=4#b1

moreover, the mentioned source in the Jatav wikipage does not mentioned anywhere that Jatav is subcaste of chamars. Thanks.

MartianGuru (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There really is no reason to move this discussion to my talk page, and definitely no reason to have the same discussion twice, so I'm moving my answer back here.

I'm not sure about "clearly". The footnote says "Subs, by Act 61 of 2002, s 2 and the First Sch., for entry 9." so what does it mean? Are both Chamar and Jatav subcastes of some other caste? Of what? I'm definitely not an expert on castes, but this is confusing. And can you explain what "Jatia Chamar" are? --Muhandes (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jatav and Chamar are subcaste of Dalit Caste (official term in Indian constitution for Dalit Caste is "Schedule Caste") Dalit. Please look at the page 8 of the reference for difference between Jatav and Chamar http://www.pwescr.org/Dalit_Report.pdf. Therefore, "Jatav is a sub-caste of Schedule Caste" is the correct statement. --MartianGuru (talk) 06:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - this seems like a clear and reliable source. --Muhandes (talk) 08:47, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi MartianGuru,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Lala Ram Ken, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 14:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain why you want this deleted. For the moment, I'm declining to do so, since we normally include articles on all MPs, and the material appears to be cited. Please respond on my talk p., to make sure I see it. DGG ( talk ) 00:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barkha Dutt

MartianGuru, please be careful while editing biographies of living persons. Your recent edits to the article on Barkha Dutt are poorly sourced. Please see Wikipedia's policy on verifiability and guideline on using reliable sources. All assertions on the article should be made only after identifying proper and reliable sources backing them. Any poorly sourced or unreferenced assertions will be immediately removed. Editors who continue to add content that may be construed as defamatory may have their editing privileges revoked by an administrator on the project. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 08:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]