User talk:Martha F.

Feedback appreciated. Martha F. (talk) 00:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Martha F.. You have new messages at WP:FEED#User:Martha_F..2FUnfinished_Spaces.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, I replied to your request for feedback. I hope my comments/suggestions are useful, but if you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Thanks! Chevy monte carlo 06:10, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Unfinished Spaces film website banner 2011.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Unfinished Spaces film website banner 2011.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 00:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About File:Unfinished Spaces film website banner 2011.jpg

Since the Author has given you permission you should email the email, which the author gave you permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or if she didn't give you premission you could us {{Non-free logo}}.--Breawycker (talk to me!) 14:24, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Unfinished Spaces film website banner 2011.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Unfinished Spaces film website banner 2011.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:53, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional editing

This was startlingly obvious promotional content, and the content was not supported at all by the source.

Would you please disclose if you some real world relationship with the OurBrainBank project? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 14:40, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

moved here, from my talk page Jytdog (talk) 13:54, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry, yes, I'm a friend of a friend with Glioblastoma and I offered to help. If you don't think it's appropriate for now, I understand. It's a new venture and they're seeking more people with Glioblastoma to join the study. Below are the academics involved with the study.

Fabio Iwamoto, MD, Columbia University, Deputy Director of Neuro-oncology. Experience includes Weill Cornell, Memorial Sloane Kettering, NIH and NCI. Extensive research experience in GBM.

Lakshmi Nayak, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Assistant Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical School. Fellowship at Memorial Sloane Kettering. Residency at NY Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medical College

http://www.ourbrainbank.com/who-we-are

Is there another place you think this could go? Research with apps for medical uses?

Thanks for your help, as you can see from my contributions, I'm not a expert! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martha F. (talk • contribs) 13:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for being forthright. I understand your desire to help your friend but Wikipedia is not a vehicle to promote or advertise anything. Please see WP:PROMO. Jytdog (talk) 13:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OurBrainBank for Glioblastoma (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OurBrainBank for Glioblastoma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OurBrainBank for Glioblastoma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Martha F.! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 06:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:OurBrainBank for Glioblastoma concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:OurBrainBank for Glioblastoma, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:OurBrainBank for Glioblastoma

Hello, Martha F.. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:OurBrainBank for Glioblastoma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:OurBrainBank for Glioblastoma

Hello, Martha F.. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "OurBrainBank for Glioblastoma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]