User talk:Marshal John1212

Welcome!

Hello, Earthly Biotics, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Earthly Biotics/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 15:36, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Earthly Biotics/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Earthly Biotics/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 15:36, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:37, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marshal John1212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the page is solely factual and no advertising

Decline reason:

Oh come on. It's one of the most promotional articles I've ever read. If you wish to write about something else, something for which you wouldn't be violating WP:COI, WP:PROMO, and WP:PAID, please follow the instructions above. Yamla (talk) 17:09, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marshal John1212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Instead of being insulting ref:"oh come on". Please acknowledge many companies have their structure listed on wikipedia. Instead let us review the content that was written and alter it accordingly to a status where the content is acceptable

Decline reason:

I think I had to get to the seventh sentence in the draft to find something that was not completely marketing-speak. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 17:32, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marshal John1212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

and how do you propose we alter it/create a page when we are 'blocked indefinitely' ?

Decline reason:

If you do not understand the difference between encyclopedia articles created by the community and advertising created by and for a company, then you lack the competence to be a part of this community. Pro-tip-- accusing members of the community trusted by the community to be sysops of abuse of power by upholding the rules of the community is not going to get you anywhere. I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations To be unblocked:

you must propose a new username that meets the username policy
you must confirm that this account is used by one individual only
you must agree to avoid creating or directly editing articles related to your organisation (requested edits will still be permitted)
you must agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose any paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy
you must indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future

If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organisation, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider alternative outlets.

I'm sorry that this message could not be more favourable.

-- Dlohcierekim  (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We don't. We don't want you to create it or alter it. That would be a violation of WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. You've been blocked to ensure you don't create or alter it. --Yamla (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

-

Wow, yet other businesses are all over wikipedia. It's a shame some admins abuse power. - E.B 20:00 19/09/18

renamed Earthly Biotics -- Marshal John1212

Céréales Killer moved page User talk:Earthly Biotics to User talk:Marshal John1212: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Earthly Biotics" to "Marshal John1212"-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for renaming my account it is much appreciated. When will I be unblocked so I can write a sentence such as "This company was incorporated on X date" ? Which is in no way against any rules & regulations. I appreciate that I did not read them before.

I think you need to reread the original block notice and the boilerplate from my decline.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:56, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marshal John1212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

From the 3 key points that I need to highlight via the 'unblock wikipapge'. 1."state your reasons for incorrect blocking" - I would say that it was actually not incorrect and that I should of been blocked due to far too much advertising from an unbiased viewpoint. 2."give reason for your block" - as aligning with point 1, i failed to read how wikipedia is very different to other websites, and it is not a marketplace to express products. 3."give evidence" - I cant seem to access the previously made page. Going forward I would just like to highlight that I do not wish to promote a business. Simply apply a sentence to acknowledge it's incorporation. thank you

Decline reason:

No reply to 331dot, or Yamla in a week. Closing as stale. SQL ^{Query me!} 18:14, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This does not address your violations of WP:COI and WP:PAID. --Yamla (talk) 00:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Addressing those: Firstly i am not being paid as i have no idea how that works. Secondly, ok understood, then let me try to contribute correctly in another fashion that is not a COI, and that will benefit the community as a whole.

Are you seriously claiming you are not employed or contracted by Earthly Biotics?!? This beggars belief. --Yamla (talk) 15:35, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would only unblock you if you agree to comply with WP:COI and WP:PAID, agree to not edit about Earthly Biotics(except by edit request), and tell what other subjects you want to edit about. If you only want to edit about Earthly Biotics, I don't see a path to unblocking you. 331dot (talk) 07:26, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely. I think i'll continue to observe for a while longer before thinking of engaging and helping out pages.