User talk:MarshalAndrewBrotherton

November 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Doughiska—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:45, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 27)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MarshalAndrewBrotherton! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roscamistan (November 29)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:33, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MarshalAndrewBrotherton/sandbox

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:MarshalAndrewBrotherton/sandbox. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 22:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Roscamistan

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Roscamistan. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 22:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal and on editing articles

I am trying to create and to edit articles, I am relatively new to editing Wikipedia articles, though I have been reading since I was 6 years old, I don’t believe it is wise to presume I am trying to vandalise. This account is to add content that is useful to Wikipedia and is not for vandalism. So, I hope my appeal is at the very least, looked at because if not, then this is a waste of all parties time. Thank you --MarshalAndrewBrotherton (talk) 23:27, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a presumption, it's obvious from your edits that you have not interested in contributing in a productive way. If you want to appeal your block, follow the instructions in your block notice. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]