User talk:MarquisCostello

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, MarquisCostello! I am Res2216firestar and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Res 2216 firestar 19:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those cookies look delicious!

Hey Marquis Costello. Lol. So you've already created an article with citations and clear-cut sections? That's fantastic. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if there is anything you need help with in getting set up and organized here. Cheers, Eric.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 21:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Same here.--Res 2216 firestar 04:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know right? Doughy chocolate chip makes my mouth water. Lol. Hey Marquis, I added China Wikiproject to the talk pages of your two new articles. Way to go, by the way!--Pericles of Athens^Talk 23:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sci and Tech of Han

Science and technology of the Han Dynasty, my new article, check it out.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 22:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very Comprehensive!MarquisCostello (talk) 23:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review for Geoffrey, Archbishop of York

I believe I've addressed all your concerns. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:46, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have passed the article as a GA. Regards, MarquisCostello (talk) 18:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

GA Review of Thomas Metcalfe (US politician)

Thanks for your review of Thomas Metcalfe (US politician). I've done my best to address your concerns. If more is needed, just leave it on the review page. It may be tomorrow night before I can address any more, but I'll get to it if need be. Acdixon ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 22:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! But not tonight. I will busy tonight and tomorrow until about 5:00 pm. After that, I can give it a look. Sorry! I have a really tight schedule right now. I shouldn't even be on Wiki right now, but I'm just checking in for a moment.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 05:24, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marquis! I can take a look at it tonight, since my schedule is much lighter now.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 21:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just left some comments. I hope my little contributions are sufficient.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 03:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GAN for Cultural Revolution Group

I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your tagging

Hey. Please be more careful with your use of tags. You have added {{expand}} and {{refimprove}} to several articles where those tags do not belong. The expansion tag should never be added to stub-class articles or dab pages, and if you add it to an article like 2009 Rally Ireland or Kindred of the Dust, you should provide an explanation why the article needs so dramatic expansion that the tag is justified. And the refimprove tag; definitely not applicable on articles like the aforementioned Kindred of the Dust or Allen Zwerdling. Thanks, Prolog (talk) 02:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The book source is so solid that I don't think there is any need for additional references. On the other hand, the web reference does not look like a reliable source and should be replaced. Thanks, Prolog (talk) 20:35, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Central Case Examination Group

On March 1, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Central Case Examination Group, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 04:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusion of the American Civil War

Done --Doug Coldwell ^talk 13:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Doug Coldwell ^talk 16:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for passing to GA status.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 11:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Sky Monitor GA Review

Hi, first of all thanks for getting the ball rolling for the Operation Sky Monitor review. I've done my best to address all of your comments. What do you think now? Cool3 (talk) 22:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the next set of comments! I've done my best with them, time for you to drop by again :). Cool3 (talk) 15:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Time to stop by again, and once again, thanks! Cool3 (talk) 01:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And one last time. Hope we've finally got it in shape. Thanks for all your work! Cool3 (talk) 15:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your help, glad we got it up to GA status! Cool3 (talk) 19:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review of Wolfgang Lüth

Thanks for helping out here. You may have figured that my English is not native. Hope it didn't grind your teeth. Anyway I believe the issues you posted have been addressed. MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For your participation in the Spring 2009 GAN backlog elimination drive, in which you reviewed 9 articles, you are granted this barnstar! Great work! —The participants on the Spring 2009 GAN backlog elimination drive 21:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

In addition, you may use the userbox located at User:Drilnoth/Userboxes/GAN backlog elimination drive to indicate your participation on your user page. Thanks! –Drilnoth (T • C) 21:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

!Achtung!

Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer! Und ein Wikipedia! Lol.

Untermensch! Dis ist your captain speaking! You vill report immediately to de vunderful artikle Han Dynasty und you vill see dat it is now ein Featured Article! Macht schnell! Time is money for de Führer!

Lol. Those Kaifeng Jews better hide before those evil Wikipedia Nazis find them! Hope you like the article. Cheers.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 19:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]