User talk:MaroneLeone

MaroneLeone, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MaroneLeone! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Ardingly College arms.svg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, MaroneLeone. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 12:56, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spanish omelette, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque Country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grandee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diplomatic Passport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Could you understand that an individual holding a nobiliary title doesn't neccessarily mean that that particular individual is primarily known by that title? If you cannot address the issue of weighting usage by yourself, stop doing automatic title changes of Spanish politicians with a nobiliary title, please.--Asqueladd (talk) 19:28, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it depends on the case, and I think trying to fully mimic usage practices for British-nobles here is a disservice (because English language practices for Spanish nobles may diverge from English language practices for British nobles), particularly in terms of secondary sources. The Marquis of Comillas was indeed commonly known as el Marqués de Comillas in Spanish, probably more than by Claudio López Bru, so I guess that as long as you find some English language source (it should not be difficult) you can tentatively defend the prevalence of the nobiliary title in the infobox (Marquess or Marquis). However, I am nearly always certain that favouring nearly "post-humous" titles in the infobox that are not particularly used is not the way to go (very much the same way than doing it in the article name). I am thinking for example of Juan Antonio Samaranch. In any case, aside from article and infobox naming, if you have interest in nobiliary titles (I don't have much interest, to be fair) there is space out of the infobox to deal with them (the likes of article expansion, inclusion of sucession templates et. al). Sometimes it looks like that rearranging the infobox is the only thing that we can do, and that's not true, particularly in the case of underdeveloped entries.---Asqueladd (talk) 20:31, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I am rather positive the Wikipedia use of the honorific_suffix parameter has got out of hand in most cases too...--Asqueladd (talk) 20:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

I've requested a sockpuppet investigation on your account here.--Asqueladd (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MaroneLeone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No need of sock puppetry investigation had to be done, as I have admitted to having owned those accounts prior to the investigation in Asqueladd's talk page. Having said this, and ever since I was blocked due to puppetry, I have only been using this account and I firmly believe that I am doing the right thing, therefore no puppetry has been used with this particular account, that is the past. My interest is in royalty and nobility, and particularly the Spanish one, as I believe that it is rather obscure as a topic in Wikipedia, when it really shoudln't be, specially when one thinks about the fact that Spain is a Kingdom and therefore is arguably one of the two most important systems of nobility (the other being UK). I am only following Wikipedia's naming conventions for nobility (read here [1]), as well as uploading free use media on commons regarding this topic. I believe I am not disrupting but rather the opposite; when I arrive at an article of a Spanish peer, it tends to be unsupervised and untidy, and I really do try my best to clean it up. Of course if the Wikipedia community or yourself considers this to be disruptive, I will accept whatever it is, but I really do want to help as much as I can. Any thoughts are more than welcome. Thank you for your time and I do apologize if I'm wasting some of it. Regards, --MaroneLeone (talk) 00:31, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Libessart100/Archive. I count seventeen accounts there. If you think you haven't been violating WP:SOCK, you are mistaken. In any case, you aren't eligible for unblock consideration here, only on your original account. Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 11:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Ardingly College arms.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ardingly College arms.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]