User talk:Maromero.wiki

Welcome!

Hello, Maromero.wiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Arturo F. Montagu, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Everymorning (talk) 01:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- help tag deleted -Maromero.wiki (talk) 02:45, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't seem you have asked a question. Datbubblegumdoe^{[talk – contribs]} 02:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Sorry, but I'm not familiar with this website and its functions. This is my first time. I'll delete the help label immediately. Maromero.wiki (talk) 02:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arturo F. Montagu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arturo F. Montagu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://jac.sagepub.com/content/3/3/407.abstract. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Everymorning (talk) 01:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Arturo F. Montagu, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Everymorning (talk) 02:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Hi, this content was created to be published in wikipedia especially due the importance of person honoree merits. Maromero.wiki (talk) 02:30, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Arturo F. Montagu has been reverted.
Your edit here to Arturo F. Montagu was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/SIGraDi/?fref=nf, https://www.facebook.com/CentroCAO/, https://www.facebook.com/Arturo-MontagÃº-192490947430556/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unfortunately, you already published it in a copyrighted source, and now it cannot be use on Wikipedia unless explicitly licensed under a CC-BY license. See WP:DCM for the formalities,. However, I do not recommend this, because the content is a tribute to him, not a neutral WP article. In an encyclopedia article, you cannot say things like " was through him that SIGraDi was created and that many of today’s relationships among people in the rchitectural computing community got started and thrived." or like "The sheer force of his intellectural activity for a long period of time in the 20th century – dense and valuable like few in architectural computing – and his invincible spirit hid the marks of his illness for a long time. " at all, because they are in the laudatory tone appropriate for an obituary., not the neutral tone of an encyclopedia.

For writing an academic bio, our style is as follows: The guiding rule is WP:PROF.You need to start off first with a biographical section, giving their birthplace and a date, schools and dates from high school on, positions and dates, all in chronological order, not inverse chronological order. This has to be in the text, not just the infobox. Then a section describing their research, linking --as you did very properly-- not just to their own work but to articles about their work from other people as well.

Then a section on major awards, by which we mean national-level awards, and elected Fellowships of national associations, presidencies of national organizations, and editor-in-chief positions for journals. In-college awards should not be included , nor student awards. The awards have to be given in the article--you cannot refer elsewhere to a list. They go in the text, only the one or two most important go in the infobox as well. The refs have to be given according to WP:REFBEGIN.

Then, if their notability depends mainly on published books, list every such book, linking to their description in WorldCat, not the publisher or Amazon. Include links to reviews--published reviews in reliable sources (I usually try to give every such review I can find in an academic journal of major reliable publication like the NYT.) If notability depends on articles, still give whatever books there are, and give the 4 or 5 most heavily cited peer-reviewed articles along with the citation count, taking the data preferable from Web of Science, or if necessary google Scholar. We normally do not include articles if there are also numerous books, unless there is one or two of special importance. We never include book chapters, lectures, speeches , posters, or the like. Major book and article awards should of course be referred to, as you did.

As matters of style: We link to all institution and society names and places the first time they appear--we link to all major concept names also--one time only. We do not link to dates. We link to the names of other people if they have a WP article. References need to show in standard bibliographic format the full references, both to print and online versions if both exist. If there is an open access version, it should be indicated as well. An external link is necessary to the person's official web site at the university. Make absolutely certain that nothing at all is copied from there or any other previous publication or web site. (It is possible to give permission if you own the copyright, but the way it's written is usually so s unsuitable that it isn't worth the trouble)

Remember that this is written for people in the general public who have heard of him, not for people in his own field. The article in ISAC is appropriate for people in his field, but not here. Personal reminiscences are not apart of an encyclopedia article. DGG ( talk ) 15:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]