User talk:Markmarxer

July 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Sockpuppetry. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:43, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Markmarxer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

was not abusing multiple accounts, I share the same IP address as my assistant who is the other account that has been accused of abusing multiple accounts Mark Marxer 14:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Then WP:MEAT would apply. You and your assistant should never be editing the same articles. As we cannot tell the difference, WP:SOCK therefore needs to be invoked (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Markmarxer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My apologies as we are both new to Wikipedia and must not have thoroughly reviewed all of the guidelines. We thought since we were under our own usernames when we made the edits it would have been apparent that it was not the same account. Thank you for your feedback, it will not happen again. Mark Marxer 14:10, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It seems probable that your "assistant" was you, but even if it wasn't it was clearly someone editing on your behalf, repeating exactly the same disruptive edit as you had made, following a warning to you not to do so. That in itself is sufficient for a block, but if we add the fact that your only purpose here seems to be self-promotion, and your disruption by blanking a deletion discussion, it does not look at all as though allowing you to continue to edit will benefit the project. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.