User talk:Marketdiamond/RIDC
Here's a article that can provide info: http://triblive.com/news/allegheny/3323996-74/ridc-hara-industrial
- MD, be weary of Wikipedia:Citation overkill of Wikipedia:Bombardment. CrazyPaco (talk) 03:01, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Appreciation CP. Took me a second but I see what you're saying, I read these citations to learn and retain knowledge as opposed to say deleting knowledge, since you've been around to see some of my other contributions there's no need to say that for every cite I submit there are 3 or 4 I read and don't see value in chronicling, perhaps I should make it clear in other forums what an avid reader I am. Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way 06:03, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- My point is, in a discussion about the notability of this topic, the appearance of overkill, even if unintentional, may be detrimental. RIDC is notable; you don't necessarily need three citations for every basic, non-controversal fact (unless they are bringing unique supporting data to the factual statement). Just be aware of it. CrazyPaco (talk) 04:36, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you CP. Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way 22:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- My point is, in a discussion about the notability of this topic, the appearance of overkill, even if unintentional, may be detrimental. RIDC is notable; you don't necessarily need three citations for every basic, non-controversal fact (unless they are bringing unique supporting data to the factual statement). Just be aware of it. CrazyPaco (talk) 04:36, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Appreciation CP. Took me a second but I see what you're saying, I read these citations to learn and retain knowledge as opposed to say deleting knowledge, since you've been around to see some of my other contributions there's no need to say that for every cite I submit there are 3 or 4 I read and don't see value in chronicling, perhaps I should make it clear in other forums what an avid reader I am. Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way 06:03, 3 November 2013 (UTC)