User talk:MarketBoiCYM

This user is a student editor in California_State_University_Sacramento/ENVS_10H_(Spring_2019) .

Welcome!

Hello, MarketBoiCYM, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Navai Review of Pocket Pets Article

Lead Section:

   The history section at the start is well written, however there is no lead section that generally explains what pocket pets are and there significance. This should be added above the history section at the top of the page.

Structure:

   The structure of the pocket pets looks good, with each section being clearly distinct from the others. One thing to consider is if any of these pocket pets could be grouped into their own category if they have any similarities that others do not.

Balance coverage:

   The coverage of the article shows a good balance. Each of the pocket pets so far has a good chunk of information, and no single section dominates the page.

Neutrality:

   Reading through the article, the information seems factual and unbiased. There is no siding with one particular viewpoint or the other.

Reliability:

   The article's sources seem to be reliable because they come from science journals and organizations, while staying away from informal blogs or self-published writers. The variety of the sources also seems adequate.

AlanNavai (talk) 23:22, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Response

Hi Nathan,

Thank you for your feedback. Including scholarly sources was not on my mind so thank you for pointing that out, I will be sure to add them. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shannonnancysw (talk • contribs) 23:56, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Instructor Feedback

You've added a lot of content to Pocket pet, nice work! Here are some suggestions to make sure you get a good grade:

The parallel of "history" to "comparison" is a bit awkward, can you combine the content for each animal?
Since there are articles for each animal, provide a notice+link to the main article for those titles, e.g. see the "Classification" section of mammal
Check for spelling and grammar

--Julianfulton (talk) 19:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]