User talk:Markdrows

Markdrows, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Markdrows! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Blackguard SF. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Khuzaima Qutbuddin, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. We cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Blackguard 08:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Khuzaima Qutbuddin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Blackguard 19:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Khuzaima Qutbuddin, you may be blocked from editing. Blackguard 21:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mufaddal Saifuddin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| occupation = Accepted(>99.99% of Dawoodi Bohra population) 53rd [[Da'i al-Mutlaq]] of the [[Dawoodi Bohras]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saifee Mahal

The article Saifee Mahal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about somebody's house. No sign of notability per WP:GNG, only reference is to an open wiki.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:44, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saifee Mahal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saifee Mahal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saifee Mahal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:32, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mufaddal_Saifuddin, you may be blocked from editing. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:01, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Khuzaima_Qutbuddin. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:04, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Qutbi Bohra

You have made your 2 reverts on Qutbi Bohra, if you made 3rd revert regardless of what you have reverted, it will be considered as the violation of our WP:EDITWAR guidelines. Be alert, and good luck with your editing. OccultZone (Talk) 07:59, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not doing any EditWar. Please stop summichum who is adding vandalism content to the page.

May 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Qutbi Bohra, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Summichum (talk) 10:35, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Summichum: You are not an admin. Please don't make me fool by making Admin like comments.--Markdrows (talk) 08:04, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Markdrows reported by User:Summichum (Result: ). Thank you. Summichum (talk) 10:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Result: Reporter(Summichum) Blocked for 2 weeks --Markdrows (talk) 03:21, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Rukn950 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Darkwind (talk) 06:45, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{yo:Darkwind}} Sir , I am not a sockpuppet of Rukn950 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) . This person is from Surat, Gujarat, India and I am from Indore, India. May be IP address near about same, but we are not same person. Please please further investigate. Thanks