User talk:Mark Stuart Betts

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Mark Stuart Betts (talk · contribs) has been paid by Dr. William Davies (Psychologist). Pages edited: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Davies_(psychologist); https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reading_Well_Books_on_Prescription; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Andrew%27s_Healthcare; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partnerships_in_Care

Welcome!

Hello, Mark Stuart Betts, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Reading Well Books on Prescription. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JezGrove (talk) 14:30, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed editing privileges

Hey Mark I have removed your editing privileges until we can get the WP:COI sorted out. Please have a read of that and comply with those rules there. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reading Well Books on Prescription

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reading Well Books on Prescription, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 20:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

Thanks for the disclosure. Please keep in mind that it is best to post to the talk pages of articles where you have a COI. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi James, thank you for this and I will make sure that I propose any changes to the talk pages in the future. Is it now okay to remove the Maintenance heading on St Andrew's Healthcare (now that the edits have been deleted), and also on Reading Well Books on Prescription (now that the page has been edited)? If you could get back to me on this that would be great. With best wishes, Mark. 10:42, 15 August 2016 (GMT)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Association for Psychological Therapies (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft reads promotionally, like an advertisement for APT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Association for Psychological Therapies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mark Stuart Betts, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:DICES Risk Assessment and Management System has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:DICES Risk Assessment and Management System. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:34, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DICES Risk Assessment and Management System (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Waggie was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hardly any of the sources offered discuss DICES at all, much less comprehensively. We require independent, journalistic discussion of a topic for inclusion, and that the article be summarized from what those journalistic sources say. This reads more like an essay, than an encyclopedic article. Encyclopedic articles do not argue a case (as this does), they simply state facts based on reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DICES Risk Assessment and Management System and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waggie (talk) 03:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Association for Psychological Therapies

Hello, Mark Stuart Betts. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Association for Psychological Therapies".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 04:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DICES Risk Assessment and Management System concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:DICES Risk Assessment and Management System, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DICES Risk Assessment and Management System

Hello, Mark Stuart Betts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DICES Risk Assessment and Management System".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:58, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Association for Psychological Therapies has been accepted

Association for Psychological Therapies, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

scope_creep^Talk 11:14, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]