User talk:Mark Heiden

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!

Pritzker Military Library links

In general, it's not a good idea to add a link to an external site to dozens of Wikipedia articles without discussing it first. If you are an employee or representative of the Pritzker Military Library, you may want to review our guidelines on promotional linking and how to handle potential conflicts of interest. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure that you can appreciate how a conflict of interest might be perceived where the Library's own External Affairs Coordinator, during working hours, appears on Wikipedia and starts adding dozens of external links back to his employer's web site. Though the Library appears to be a non-profit organization, we nevertheless tend to get a bit concerned when a lot of external links rapidly appear, particularly when they represent the bulk of an editor's contributions to Wikipedia. Though I wouldn't ever dispute that your intentions were good, your approach was of the sort that tends to raise red flags for Wikipedia regulars. The advice on this page (particularly point #9) is worth reading.

The criteria for including external links are fairly strict, though I certainly agree with you that we fall far short of those standards in some of our articles. (Bear in mind, though, that the existence of other unsuitable links isn't a strong argument in favour of adding additional unsuitable links. If you should happen to run across pointless, promotional, or otherwise poor-quality external links in the future, feel free to remove them from the articles. The 'External links' sections of some of our popular, high-traffic articles require regular attention from a red pencil, a set of pruning shears, or a flamethrower.)

If you should choose to add links to your Library in the future, I would urge you to do so sparingly, and bearing the following advice in mind.

Be sure the link is on point. This edit added a link to an interview with Robert Kurson, author of Shadow Divers (a book about the discovery of a U-boat wreck off the coast of New Jersey) to our article on U-boats. Is the link related to U-boats? Yes. Is it of key importance to the topic, or somehow more essential than interviews with any of myriad other authors and historians who have studied or wrote about U-boats in the last sixty years? Well...probably not.

Similarly, this edit added a link to an interview with Dave R. Palmer, where he discusses George Washington and Benedict Arnold. Again, many historians have discussed Washington and shared their perspectives in many different media. Is there anything that makes this interview special enough to be elevated above all others and appear in our article on George Washington?

In general, aim to add links to the most specific articles. The Kurson interview might be suitable for Robert Kurson (when that article is created) or in Shadow Divers. The Palmer interview could be appropriate for a future article on Dave R. Palmer. While I didn't screen all of your links, many seemed to fall into this sort of tangentially-related category.

When in doubt, use the article talk page first. All of our articles have 'discussion' or 'talk' pages; these pages can be reached by clicking on the 'discussion' tab above the article. Create a new section on the talk page (click the '+' button at the top of the page) and ask for comments or advice about the appropriateness of your proposed link. It's best to identify your affiliation with the Library, as well. If the response is positive, or there's no response for several days, then you can go ahead and add the link to the 'External links' section of the article.

Editors here are often more welcoming and flexible if you're willing to make an effort to contribute content – writing and editing articles, uploading free images, etc. &ndsah; to Wikipedia, and not just create external links to your own organization.

Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 17:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to add back links where appropriate, keeping in mind the instructions above and erring on the side of discussion before linking. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oak-Land Jr. High School

Hi, you restored a paragraph that was deleted by an anon,[1] but did you actually read the paragraph? It's pretty obvious nonsense. --El on ka 17:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]