User talk:Mark25251999

Welcome...

Hello, Mark25251999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. You may also be interested in our intuitive guide to Wikipedia. Again, welcome! SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 18:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Boden's Mate

I saw your comments at Boden's Mate. It is a rare position in which a bishop is better than a queen. See chess piece relative value. Bubba73 (talk), 16:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Existence of God

Thank you for the addition of links to Existence of God. But a large part of what you added seemed to be a quote from Paine, not a link at all. And another link was an internal one to a Wikipedia article. Before addding any more such links, may I suggest you look at the format used in external-links sections of articles (or consult the guideline at Wikipedia:External links). Cheers. SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 18:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please take some time to look at the various guidelines on how to edit. And before you save a page, preview what you have done. This version of the existence of god article was really messed up. Thanks! SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 18:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Three reverts

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.