User talk:MariusM/Heaven of Transnistria

This page was nominated for deletion on 25 April 2007. The result of the discussion was No consensus--RELIST.

Deletion attempt

If this page was deleted from Wikipedia, why is it still residing on a Wikipedia.org server? - Mauco 19:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a sandbox. Please don't edit here.--MariusM 20:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not. It is a violation of WP:USER and shall be reported if you do not take action to rectify your behavior. - Mauco 20:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion attempt of Mauco was disscussed here.--MariusM 03:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

I also suggest inserting the following template: {{Workpage}} into the draft. --Illythr 14:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I consider factual the infos in this page, even if is still a draft and it need improvements before incorporating in Wikipedia articles.--MariusM 20:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't like the text in the template, you can subst and reword it. Point is, nobody should confuse this page with a Wikipedia article. The subpage is first in the google hitlist [1] (apparently, you can be credited with the invention of the phrase), so I insist that it be clearly marked as a sandbox/draft. --Illythr 01:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FPS improvements suggestions

Future Perfect at Sunrise made some changes in the article [2] which were meantime reverted. This talk page is the place for improvement proposals. Few thoughts about FPS edit:

Giving a quote of 2-3 sentences from somebody, mentioning the name of the person quoted is not plagiarism. Plagiarism is when you try to present somebody else ideas as your own ideas.
Some fact tags are inappropiate, you need just to go to the sites and see the info is correct. However, in some situations the idea of exact refference is good.--MariusM 17:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

The deletion debate was wrongly closed as "delete", while it was no consensus with majority of participants voting for keep. I've asked the closing admin for a review of the debate [3]--MariusM 12:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I, indeed, reviewed it, but as a debate — not a "vote." You and/or some participants may have thought it was a vote, but that was illusory. El_C 09:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]