User talk:MariskaNanni

May 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to AfriForum has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: AfriForum was changed by MariskaNanni (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87308 on 2018-05-03T14:03:20+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MariskaNanni, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MariskaNanni! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to AfriForum, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 08:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at AfriForum. Doug Weller talk 17:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at AfriForum, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 07:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Ernst Roets, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 15:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship to AfriForum?

Is editing their article something you are paid to do, ie is it part of a job you hold or freelance work? See WP:PAID and please comply with it if you are getting any form of recompense for editing. Doug Weller talk 16:41, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 17:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MariskaNanni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Disputing reasons for being blocked. Trying to add credible sources and improve neutrality. Page is not neutral at all. Same three users keep adding bias sources. I want to be put in contact with someone who will be able to truly improve neutrality. The current representation of AfriForum's Wikipedia-page is not neutral at all. Some of the sources are mere opinion pieces cited as factual sources. I don't understand how someone can be blocked for adding more, credible sources or disagreeing with the three editors. Major blow to Wikipedia's credibility and very bias. If editing is not done in the right manner, rather advise on how to do it differently instead of just blocking people.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:37, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.