User talk:Mariontognoni

Stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. This is not free advertising space. Further vandalism may lead to blocks without warning.

Re: Jumbling Towers Vandalism

Hey Mike. I have noticed that you ignorantly removed my section and review information from the Jumbling Towers wiki article. My buddy Tyler and I keep this up (seeing as we both wrote it) to date as more reviews/achievments/information becomes available on the band. We (the band and I) are childhood friends. I would not "vandalize" something about my comrades that I wrote. That's proposterous. You are attacking the very people who are adding truth and credibility to wikipedia. Nothing on their page is advertisment, it is band reviews and anything else the guys decide to delve into. Thanks.

I ask that you please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:List of bad article ideas. Material describing a product with a biased point of view and linking to a for-profit website is almost by definition advertising. Michaelbusch 00:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Everyother band site has external links to their reveiws and are no more/less bias than I. I am just writing down fact.

I contest the validity of the first statement, but if it is true, then I have great sympathy for WikiProject:Music. Michaelbusch 00:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Jumbling Vanalism Again??

I have read the terms mike. You take out my edits claiming "bias", yet allow "They are best known for their lively and witty performances along with an original sound." This is just a "biased". You nor I can prove that they are "witty" or maintain some sort of "original sound", no more than you can prove the statements I wrote that you have omitted. make up your mind pleae. And please stop correcting an article maybe two people veiw a year. Thanks.

I've flagged the entire article as unencyclopedic, because, as you say, it is biased. That an article is low-traffic is not a reason to not correct it or have it removed. In fact, it makes corrections all that more important. There have been many requests that editors pay more attention to such articles. Michaelbusch 00:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jumbling towers

A tag has been placed on Jumbling towers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 21:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove the db tag from an article you have written. There is no text in the article, therefore it is not an encyclopedia article. In addition, please read WP:BAND. Even if you add text to the article, there is no guarantee that the band will meet the guidelines required for having an article here. Corvus cornix 21:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]