User talk:Mario And Weegee

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:34, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Mario And Weegee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Latvian Ethnographic Open Air Museum. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DThomsen8 (talk) 15:50, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Your recent editing history at User talk:Flyer22 Reborn shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
It's pretty clear from his contribution history that he's not retired. Either way, it's really disruptive for you to be editing another user's talk page heading this way, and that in itself could get you blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 16:34, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to discuss the edit war

Okay. Then explain this edit—not only had you been removing the de facto and de jure phrases from the article (and thus making it contradict itself), but here you just outright vandalized the article. What constructive purpose did this serve? —C.Fred (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]