User talk:Marinecore88

Mahinda Rajapaksa

stopgenocide.ca is obviously, from its name alone, not a reliable source. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 04:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. snowolfD4 ^{( talk / @ )} 15:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Allegations of State terrorism by Sri Lanka, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Allegations of State terrorism by Sri Lanka was changed by Marinecore88 (u) (t) deleting 9494 characters on 2009-02-24T05:06:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Talk:2009 suicide air raid on Colombo, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. snowolfD4 ^{( talk / @ )} 17:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:29, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. snowolfD4 ^{( talk / @ )} 00:51, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gotabhaya Rajapaksa

Why the following should be deleted on Gotabhaya Rajapaksa. RS supports the following content. Melienas (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

US Allegations of Genocide Against Tamil Minorities

Gotabhaya Rajapaksa has been recently served with a genocide indictment charge, filed with the US Justice Department by former Associate Deputy Attorney General, Bruce Fein^[1]. The 1000-page, 3 volume case has been submitted and is currently under review by the US Justice Department for 12 counts of genocide against Gotabhaya Rajapaksa. ^[2]

My previous account is blocked by User: YellowMonkey, a Psycho ArbCom Troll on Tamil issues and my post is deleted by another sock subsecuently. please disscuss this issues at SLRC or take this for RFC. Thanks.Meliioure (talk) 08:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gotabhaya Rajapaksa

Thank you for contacting me. The aforementioned text does not appear to be in violation of WP:BLP, and it would have been painstakingly difficult for anyone to make a legitimate argument suggesting otherwise. Please try to remain civil in the future.

For information on appealing your block, please see WP:GAB and WP:APPEAL. — C M B J 05:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marinecore88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not used a sockpuppet (I don't really know what it is but I only have one account and i only use this one account), And the reverting i did was in response to vandalism when the other reverters refused to use the talk pages. I've explained my views here [[1]] near the bottom. Please unblock me, thank you.

Decline reason:

You have made repeated gross WP:BLP violations, e.g. here. Sandstein 06:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marinecore88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not using a sockpuppet. The person who blocked me, Yellowmonkey, did so because he thought I was with another group of puppets which i was not. And the owner of the other sockpuppet acounts acknowelges that I was not one of his sockpuppet acounts as he acknowledges here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SebastianHelm#Marinecore88.E2.80.8E.2FMelienas.E2.80.8E.2FMeliioure.E2.80.8E.2FSobberrs.E2.80.8E.2FCheares . Also, The person who blocked me is also doing this without validating anything as you can tell by his comment here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nishkid64#Tamil_Tigers. Furthermore, my previous request for an unblock was denied because I vandalized a page about a month ago, but Since then I have not vandalized at all, making sure all my contribuations were well cited and extensively using talk pages like WP:SLR.thank you for your help!

Decline reason:

Nishkid64 has confirmed your sockpuppeteering activities.[2] Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How to get out of this mess

I put in a good word for you here, and I want to get you out of the circle of constantly getting blocked. But I need your promise to remain civil and follow Wikipedia:SLR/Don't re-revert!. If you agree with that, let me know which of your accounts you would like to keep. — Sebastian 22:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/02/15/genocide_in_sri_lanka/

[2] ttp://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/02/15/genocide_in_sri_lanka/

[1]

[2]